Laserfiche WebLink
Applicable Regulations <br />4. The plight of the petitioner is due to circumstances unique to <br />the property not a consequence of the petitioner's own action or <br />inaction. <br />Due to the uniqueness of an easement serving two additional parcels, we are limited to the <br />practicality of space on said site. <br />Due to the uniqueness of an easement serving two additional parcels, we are limited to the <br />practicality of moving the basin to the north. The building is an L-shaped building. The 90- <br />degree angle on the inside corner would be impractical to construct at a 65-degree angle. We <br />also considered removing the sidewalk between the building and parking lot. However, it is <br />much more practical and safer to have dedicated space for pedestrian traffic to and from their <br />vehicles in the parking lot and the structure on the southwest corner of apartment homes. <br />The applicant states that the practical difficulties lie in preserving free and clear access for the <br />parcels to the east – both of which currently access their properties through the site. One of <br />the homes was constructed in 1972 and the other in 1978, neither directly abut a public street <br />and do not have any other means of access to their properties. The access easement <br />connection noted by the applicant must be maintained in the same location as it is today. <br />Page 81 of 97