Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Oakwater Ridge EAW 10 <br />Findings of Fact and Conclusions, Response to Comments, and Record of Decision <br />12. Ecological Resources. The aquatic resources on/adjacent to the project area, the wetlands, and the <br />Mississippi River, provide habitat for amphibians, fish, and small mammals. The wildlife habitat has <br />diminished value due to historic cultivation and annual tillage. Wildlife is also constrained by the major <br />roadways nearby, U.S. 10/169 and Minnesota 101. The surrounding cultivated fields, residential <br />developments, industrial land uses, and major roadways create limitations for wildlife habitat. The <br />Minnesota DNR shows the northwestern corner of the Project Area as within a Metro Conservation <br />Corridor. <br />A review of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Information for Planning and Consultation <br />(IPaC) assessment tool was completed on December 31st, 2024 to identify federally listed species <br />that have the potential to occur within the project area. Utilizing the MnDNR’s Minnesota <br />Conservation Explorer tool, a Natural Heritage Review was requested. An official NHIS letter was <br />issued on August 30th, 2024. Mitigation measures outlined in the EAW will be followed to minimize <br />potential impacts to the identified federal and listed species. <br />13. Historic Resources. The Oliver H. Kelly Farmstead is a National Historic Landmark and is located <br />adjacent to and south of the project area. In order to mitigate potential impacts to the Oliver H. Kelly <br />Farmstead along the southern project area boundary, trees will be planted to screen the farmstead <br />from the development and a split rail wood fence is anticipated along the southern property line. A <br />Phase 1 Archaeological Investigation was completed for the Oakwater Ridge site by In Situ <br />Archaeological Consulting. One newly recorded archaeological resource (21SH0093) and one newly <br />recorded architectural resource were observed and recorded during the cultural resource survey of <br />the Project. The newly recorded architectural resource (vacant house that is part of the farm complex) <br />was recommended as not eligible for the NRHP. For 21SH0093, In Situ recommends avoidance of <br />the resource and to have no ground disturbing activities take place within or near the resource. At this <br />time, site 21SH0093 is at least 25 feet from the proposed extent of ground disturbance for the project, <br />which will avoid impacts to the site. <br /> <br />14. Visual Resources. The project area sits adjacent to and above the Mississippi River. This relative <br />highpoint will be maintained, and the potential viewshed will be minimally altered. The proposer is <br />committed to conserving mature trees to the extent possible, specifically along the western hillslope. <br />The western portion of the site is within shoreland and, therefore, subject to stricter vegetation <br />alteration requirements, setbacks, and large lot sizes. Moreover, the development is clustered along <br />U.S. Highway 10, leaving the western portion as open space, which will mitigate impacts on the <br />viewshed from the Mississippi River. Floating docks will be visible on the shore of the scenic river <br />corridor. The development will adhere to the City’s landscaping and screening requirements, <br />enhancing the visual character and promoting compatibility between land uses. <br />15. Air. The development is not anticipated to include any stationary source emissions from sources such <br />as boilers or exhaust stacks. Hazardous air pollutants are not anticipated to be generated onsite post- <br />development. The emissions produced will be in alignment with the planned future land use outlined <br />in the City’s Comprehensive Plan. Minor emissions generated from construction equipment will occur <br />during the construction phase. Contractors will be responsible for ensuring equipment is properly <br />maintained and not contributing to excess emissions. Dust and odor (gas machinery, etc.) production <br />will be elevated during construction but will be minimized by standard dust control methods. <br /> <br />16. Greenhouse Gas Emissions (GHG)/Carbon Footprint. Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions are <br />summarized for project construction and operation. Emissions are reported were annualized over the <br />estimate lifecycle of the development (50 years). Estimated emissions are aligned with the planned <br />land uses. The residential homes are anticipated to include energy efficient appliances. On-site <br />landscaping will absorb a portion of the GHG emissions and reduce the local urban heat island effect. <br />Consideration of additional mitigation opportunities will continue through planning, design, and <br />permitting. <br /> <br />17. Noise. Project construction is anticipated to temporarily increase noise levels for nearby receptors. <br />Development will adhere to the City code, which does not permit construction activities (all