Laserfiche WebLink
<br />KKE ARCHITECTS: 0606.1159.01 <br /> <br />SITE FEASIBILITY STUDY REPORT <br /> <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br /> <br />~ <br />MvtL <br /> <br />SITE FEASIBILITY STUDY <br />GREAT RIVER REGIONAL LIBRARY SYSTEM <br />CITY OF ELK RIVER <br /> <br />Fi~ure 10: Site Option Score Tabulation Summary <br />(ORDER: 1 = Good, 2=Better, 3=Best) <br /> <br />An alternative method of establishing priorities is to score each site as "good, better, best" <br />using a 3-point system. This method provides a check that addresses the comparative value for <br />each of the three possible site locations. <br /> <br />STAFF INPUT Order <br />CRITERIA WEIGHT A B C <br />Design and Site 16 15 23 <br />Comprehensive Plan .::-'.~...':' "7:- <br />10 2 1 3 <br />Availability of Utilities 5 3 1 2 <br />Size & Shape 9 1 2 3 <br />Site Expandability 12 1 2 3 <br /> -- - . <br />Shared Amenities 8 1 3 2 <br />Soil Conditions 5 3 1 2 <br />Views/Aesthetic Qual. 10 1 3 2 <br /> . ...--.....;...-, <br />Safe Site Access . <br />11 2 1 3 <br /> .~ ."- <br />Pedestrian Access 8 2 1 3 <br />Community Criteria 8 5 11 <br />Proximity to housing 5 2 1 3 <br />Access to Highways 7 2 1 3 <br />Visability 12 , 1 2 3 <br />Acceptable adjacent uses 9 3 1 2 <br />Cost Criteria 11 7 12 <br />Site Purchase 7 1 2 3 <br />Site Development Cost 9 3 1 2 <br />Utilities Costs 7 3 1 2 <br />Road Development Costs 8 2 1 3 <br />Assessments 7 2 2 2 <br />Total Score 8.28 35 27 46 <br /> 32% 25% 43% <br /> <br />- 40- <br />