Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />River <br /> <br />SITE FEASIBILITY STUDY <br />GREAT RIVER REGIONAL LIBRARY SYSTEM <br />CITY OF ELK RIVER <br /> <br />FiQure 9: Criteria Priority RankinQ <br />(PRIORITY: 1 = Important, 2=Very Important, 3=Most Important) <br /> <br />Scoring of the three alternative sites is based upon eighteen categories. Each factor has been <br />assigned a value on a scale of 1 to 3 for important with a score of 3 being the highest and most <br />important. The weighting factor column is the total of the four assigned priority values. <br /> <br />STAFF INPUT Prioritv Assigned <br />CRITERIA WEIGHT 1 2 3 4 AVE <br />Design and Site <br /> r -.;f.... ... .., <br />Comprehensive Plan 10 .1 2 3 3 2 2.50 <br />Availability of Utilities 5 1 1 2 1 1.25 <br />Size & Shape 9 2 3 3 1 2.25 <br /> " <br />Site Expandability 12 3 3 3 3 3.00 <br />Shared Amenities 8 2 2 1 3 2.00 <br />Soil Conditions 5 1 1 1 2 1.25 <br />Views/Aesthetic Qual. 10 3 2 2 3 2.50 <br /> ~ <br /> , I <br />Safe Site Access 11 i 2 3 3 3 2.75 <br />Pedestrian Access 8 2 2 1 3 2.00 <br />Community Criteria <br />Proximity to housing 5 2 1 1 1 1.25 <br />Access to Highways 7 3 1 2 1 1.75 <br />Visability 12 3 3 3 3 3.00 <br />Acceptable adjacent uses 9 1 2 3 3 2.25 <br />Cost Criteria <br />Site Purchase 7 1 2 2 2 1.75 <br />Site Development Cost 9 3 2 2 2 2.25 <br />Utilities Costs 7 1 2 2 2 1.75 <br />Road Development Costs 8 2 2 2 2 2.00 <br />Assessments 7 1 2 2 2 1.75 <br />Total Score 8.28 35 37 38 39 2.07 <br /> <br />(1 =Important, 2=Very Important, 3=Most Important) <br /> <br />KKE ARCHITECTS: 0606.1159.01 <br /> <br />SITE FEASIBILITY STUDY REPORT <br /> <br />- 39- <br />