My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8.2 SR 11-06-2023
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2021 - 2030
>
2023
>
11-06-2023
>
8.2 SR 11-06-2023
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/3/2023 9:24:24 AM
Creation date
11/3/2023 9:18:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
11/6/2023
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
64
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Citv Council Minutes <br />Octobei 16, 2023 <br />Page 5 <br />Councilmember Be�Ter asked about the environmental concerns. Mr. Carlton stated the drivewa�T <br />violates DNR setback requirements because it is within 100 feet of the river and `vould require a <br />variance. He further stated there is a recommendation for berming so additional erosion is stopped. <br />Councilmember Westgaard questioned the applicant about `vhere supplies are delivered and stored. <br />JeYemy Shank stated he purchases supplies at retail stoYes and some supplies aYe left with customers, <br />while others are stored in trucks. He stated employTees do park on the propertyT when they need to <br />pick up the trucks prior to heading to job sites. <br />Councilmember Westgaard concurred with the Planning Commission's recommendation. He stated <br />the conditional use permit standards have not been met and the business has outgrown the residential <br />area due to the amount of equipment it has and its use intensityT. <br />Councilmember Grupa concurred stating the business has gro`vn, gotten out of control, and the <br />applicant is now scrambling to make it right He wants the applicant to succeed but the commercial <br />operation is not a good fit for a residential neighborhood. <br />Moved by Councilmember Westgaard and seconded by Councilmember Grupa to direct staff <br />to prepare a Resolution with Findings of Fact denying Conditional Use Permit, Case No. CU <br />23-19 as Conditional Use Permit standards, one, fve, and six cannot be met as stated in the <br />Planning Commission report. Motion carried 4-0. <br />8.1 Stop Sign Request <br />MayTor Dietz opened this item for comment. <br />Sam Obwaya, 9999 215`�' Avenue — Requested a stop sign at 215`i' Avenue and Edison Circle because <br />he feels there is a lot of traffic, a group home, and deliver�T vehicles, through the area. He stated he <br />has a special needs child `vho runs outside and is concerned �vith speeds in the area. <br />Neil Thomas, 9998 215`�' Avenue — Stated the cityr needs to be proactive veYsus reactive and the <br />whole neighborhood wants the sign. He also questioned ho�v staff kne`v `vhat the traffic count was <br />for this area. <br />Kathy Palmer, 19049 Dodge Street — Stated there are issues with traffic, kids can be unpYedictable <br />and there is a need to make roads safe. She suggested that instead of a stop sign, all cityT streets should <br />be 20 mph. <br />Mr. Femrite presented the staff report He stated, based on adopted policyT, staff recommendation is <br />not to install a stop sign because it doesn't meet the engineering warrants, would provide a false sense <br />of securityT. and mayT not be legallyT enforceable or defendable. He explained how counts are <br />determined and noted stop signs aYe installed at intersections to allow for safe access not foY <br />addressing speed. He further noted the Council can override the policyT. <br />MayTor Dietz stated he monitored the location and did see a reason for a stop sign. <br />Councilmember Grupa concurred noting he evaluated the location as `vell and suggested <br />consideration of alternative solutions b�T the homeowners. <br />rowEnEo er <br />��►�u�� <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.