7.9 SR 07-17-2023 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

7. A PUD shall -tot adversely affect existia�g orpaopio.sed packs, schools, staeetf or otherpublie frtcilitiew. Existing public facilities are not impacted by the proposed project and additional park facilities are included in the project. 8. The council may estab&b vaaxed and seasonable lot aaea, _ outage, side -yard, and setback aequinments foa• a PUD and may aarthcaz e a density al j3PG'1J It deteaP7PPneS t0 be eappaopslate undea' the cimumstances. Any peamZtted density shall be consisteaat n ilh the ci r`s comp I v bensive plan and gaol adversely cdf feet the public health, safety rand sarelfrase. The proposal is consistent with densities described in the comprehensive plan, setbacks from public rights--of-way, and design standards for similar developments within cite code. 9. Moir than one principal building may be coastnicted on a lot aa*hin a PUD ? f authoii.Zed try the Conned Unless olhensrise petmitted by the council, a PUD shall cotj� n4th the sebedaales of dimensional regulations set foa7h in this aiticle., except that individual lots shall haze no less than 80 percent of the minimum aaea foa• Similar uses. The project does not conflict with standards described in city code. Preliminary Plat City ordinance section 30-375 outlines the required findings for approval of a Preliminary Plat. 1. The psnposed subdivision is consistent r1 ith the osziiag iv gPrkatioass (article l/7 of this chaptea) and craaafolms Al all aespeas ndth call aequimments of this Conde, including the honing regPalations asPd this adicle. The proposed subdivision requires approval of a rezoning application to PUD along with a CUP that establishes the PUD. These changes will allow the development to deviate from strict interpretation of specific standards outlined in the ordinance. The deviations reviewed for this project generally relate to lot sizes and setbacks. Provided the zoning is amended to PUD, and recommended conditions are included, the proposed subdivision is consistent with all zoning regulations. 2. 7'he parsposed subdivision is coaasastent rr ith all applicalalegenerral aard speciali weed city, county, and regional plans; including but not limited to, the cYty's comps e1.+eaP.sive developmeaat plan. The subdivision is consistent with all applicable plans. The physical c%aaac7eags tics of the site, including but not limited to topography, soils, vegetation, suscepitibility to erosion and siltation, susceptibility to flooding, and drrainage ace suitable foa• the type and density of development and uses contemplated. The physical characteristics of the site support the proposed use. The wetland impacts will be reviewed by the city and state through the established review process. Stormwater features, including a network of pipes and basins, will ensure water leaving the site, and flowing on to adjacent properties, is generally consistent with present day metrics. 4. Repro osed subdivisions makes adequate psovision for rr afar sarpapaly, storrrP riarxiaaage, serr.rage trransportation, erosion contaol and all othersesvices, facilities asad innapaovements other ise irquiaed in this amcle. The subdivision includes public utilities and stormwater infrastructure that meets city requirements. Additional permits required to comply with erosion control standards are a required and must be secured prior to building permit issuance.