9.5. SR 11-07-2005 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

. Late 2003-The Personnel Committee receives a request to review the ice arena maintenance supervisor position based on a recommendation from his supervisor that there was a substantial change in job duties. . February 3, 2004-Mr. Davis completes a job analysis questionnaire resulting in a position profile that is reviewed, corrected, and approved by Mr. Davis and his Supervisor Rich Czech. . April 23, 2004-Personnel Committee reviewed position profile as approved by Mr. Czech and Mr. Davis. Center for Evaluation Research assigned point value of 58 points is approved by the Personnel Committee. . April 4, 200s-Personnel Committee discusses ice arena maintenance supervisor position based on comments from ice arena manager indicating that Mr. Davis is not pleased with the results of the Personnel Committee's recommendation. The Personnel Committee discusses this request and recommends that since the process was completed in accordance with the Personnel Committee guidelines, and since the profile was approved by both the ice arena manager and the maintenance supervisor, the Personnel Committee could not arbitrarily change the point value and Mr. Davis would need to go through the formal appeal process to the city administrator. . May 16, 200s-Position appealed to city administrator. Parks and Recreation Director Bill Maertz, Rich Czech and Jerry Davis, along with city administrator Pat Klaers, meet with the Personnel Committee to review Mr. Davis's appeal. Mr. Davis presented his case on why he was not in agreement with the Personnel Committee's recommendation. Based on the information presented and discussed at that meeting, all present recommended that a new job analysis questionnaire be completed to ensure that all of Mr. Davis's duties were included in a revised position profile. o Bruce West spends several hours with Mr. Davis and Mr. Czech completing a new JAQ. All agree that it fairly represents the duties of the position. . June 16, 2006-The Personnel Committee reviews the revised position profile generated from the new JAQ that approved by the parks and recreation director, the ice arena manager, and Mr. Davis. The Center for Evaluation Research assigns 58 points to the position. This is the exact value that was assigned previously. The Personnel Committee recommends that 58 points be assigned to this position. However, the appeal to the city administrator will continue and the city administrator will have the opportunity to over-ride the Committee's decision. . July 15, 200s-City Administrator Pat K.laers rules on the appeal and determines that he "decided to reject the comparable worth point ranking for Ice Arena Supervisor Jerry Davis." You can see that this was a long and detailed process. Throughout the process, the Personnel Committee made every effort to ensure the Mr. Davis's was treated fairly and that s: \ Council\Lori\2005 \Davis Appeal.doc