My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-22-1983 PC MIN
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Minutes
>
1980 - 1989
>
1983
>
02-22-1983 PC MIN
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:35:34 AM
Creation date
9/28/2005 3:44:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
PCM
date
2/22/1983
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />o <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />Planning Commission Minutes <br />February 22, 1983 <br />Page Eight <br /> <br />MOTION BY COMMISSIONER HARTMAN, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER TRALLE, TO RECOMMEND <br />TO THE CITY COUNCIL TO ADOPT ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 1008.26 AS WRITTEN. THE MOTION <br />PASSED 7-0. <br /> <br />9. Consider Ordinance Amendment 900.18 <br /> <br />Rick Breezee indicated this has been a long, drawn-out situtation and explained <br />the history of the Ordinance to the new Planning Commission members. Rick Breezee <br />stressed the purpose of the ordinance. <br /> <br />Commissioner Pearce indicated how this all came about and further indicated that <br />600' puts things to far away; 300' would be more appropriate. <br /> <br />Rick Breezee indicated this whole item has become confusing because of morator- <br />iums, changes, etc... and further indicated that setbacks would have to be followed. <br />This is in regard to A-I areas where the 600' pertain. <br /> <br />Discussion followed regarding the 300' amount and it was indicated it was a hypo- <br />thetical number and it was also an amount other cities used. Rick Breezee indi- <br />cated he was not making a recommendation. <br /> <br />Chairman Tracy indicated that the Building and Zoning Administrator is the person <br />who would enforce this. <br /> <br />Zack Johnson indicated he felt that 600' was not very far and that 300' was not much <br />space. <br /> <br />Discussion followed regarding where a person could put a pole barn in relation to <br />his neighbors, which is what the Ordinance pertains to and also variances were dis- <br />cussed. <br /> <br />Commissioner Pearce discussed long, narrow lots and felt this was geared to 10-acre <br />farms. Commissioner Pearce felt that on big farms, this was not a problem and that <br />300' seems reasonable. <br /> <br />Rick Breezee discussed metal skinned buildings and indicated that staff felt 600' <br />was reasonable while Council felt 300' wassreasonable. <br /> <br />Chairman Tracy indicated there were two problems - one, either too restrictive with <br />small lots, or two, the problem it would create with the neighbors. <br /> <br />MOTION BY COMMISSIONER PEARCE, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER WARD, TO RECOMMEND TO THE <br />CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF ORDINANCE AMENDMENT' 900.18. THE MOTION PASSED 4-3, WITH <br />COMMISSIONER HARTMAN, COMMISSIONER WARD AND CHAIRMAN TRACY VOTING NO. <br /> <br />Commissioner Ward questioned the word "shall" in line 3 or the ordinance. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.