My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5.1. PCSR 04-26-2022
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Packets
>
2021-2030
>
2022
>
04-26-2022
>
5.1. PCSR 04-26-2022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/2/2022 2:16:00 PM
Creation date
4/22/2022 11:10:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
PCSR
date
4/26/2022
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
regarding long-term safety and access for the site, especially as traffic patterns begin to change due to improvements <br />in Anoka, Ramsey, and Elk River. The platooning effect of cars moving through Elk River will cease, and gaps in <br />traffic will become harder and harder to find. <br />• The only structure that is used for ERX events/gathering/assembly is the chalet and that was brought up to code in <br />2016. I don't think that this should be listed in this way. It sounds like, you're going to send Bob out to inspect again <br />to add additional costs to the chalet that we already paid for? That's not fair what if your codes changed since <br />then. Not fair. <br />Along with the chalet, the Carlson Motorsports building, the shipping container viewing area, and the bridge over the <br />track entrance are also some structures used for gathering, assembly, spectators, viewing, and/or customers. It is <br />unclear what the structures on 75-110-1100 are used for. <br />I was told the chalet was brought up to mechanical and egress code but may need a restroom as it has a retail <br />component to it also. While the city tries to be helpful with guidance, our role is not to design and determine what is <br />required, this is what a registered architect would do for you, determine what requirements are needed per all the <br />codes, including ADA regulations. <br />Yes, it is saying these building/structures need to be reviewed by the Building Official for compliance. Fairness is <br />holding all commercial businesses to city and state regulations. As ERX is a bona fide commercial business, each <br />application for a building permit, and when required by the building official for enforcement of any provisions of <br />this article, two sets of plans and specifications shall be submitted. All plans and specifications, except for single- <br />family dwellings, or any other buildings exempted by Minnesota Statute or the Minnesota State Building Code, shall <br />be prepared and signed by a registered architect or a registered professional engineer duly qualified by registration as <br />required by Minn. Stats. � 326.02. State statue 1300.0120 Subpart 4 outlines when permits shall not be required. As <br />you can see, every structure on site over 200 square feet requires a building permit, regardless of the use. <br />To get a better understating of all the functions on site is why I asked for a list of all structures, their current uses, <br />and what permits have been issued. <br />• Bullet point 9 — assuming the date will change if the map changes? Prior to CUP approval? <br />Correct <br />• Bullet point 14 — is this consistent with city code... or is this with the plans that I sent you? Keep in mind — those <br />plans were from two years ago and I'd like noted that the plans sent were an EXAMPLE of the type of sign that <br />could be used. <br />During our phone conversation I noted that we need to know the height, location, and size of changeable copy sign <br />so it would not be left open ended. Code allows up to 30 sgft without a CUP and all changeable copy signs must <br />comply with the standards set forth in Sec. 30-864 (e). A sign permit is required for all signs. The 70 sgft is based on <br />what you submitted. Please let me know if you have a desire for a larger changeable copy sign and we can update the <br />recommendation during the meeting. <br />• Clarification — I could still erect a VIP Viewing structure because it's listed as future on the map correct? <br />NK'hen/if the CUP is approved, yes, the VIP viewing structure can be constructed once a commercial building permit <br />has been issued. Does the memo indicate something otherwise? <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.