My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-23-1986 PC MIN
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Minutes
>
1980 - 1989
>
1986
>
09-23-1986 PC MIN
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:35:33 AM
Creation date
9/19/2005 3:27:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
PCM
date
9/23/1986
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Page 2 <br /> <br />Planning Commission Minutes <br />.ptember 23, 1986 <br /> <br />-------------------------- <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />5. Conditional Use Permit to Amend the Elk River Plaza PUD Agreement by <br />Barthel Construction/P.H. <br /> <br />Mr. Ken Barthel explained his request for an amendment to the Planned Unit <br />Development Agreement to allow 6,000 sq. ft of office/retail space on Lot <br />3, Block 1 in place of the 60 units of multi-family housing approved <br />previously. Mr. Barthel stated that he felt there was a greater need for <br />the office/retail space than for the multi-family housing. <br /> <br />Chairman Wilson reviewed the history of the PUD agreement, stating that <br />Lot 3, Block 1 was originally designated for housing to create a blend <br />between adjacent office/retail use and residential use. <br /> <br />Chairman Wilson opened the public hearing. <br /> <br />Mrs. Eleanor Holme of 502 5 1/2 Street, questioned whether or not it was a <br />good idea to mix residential with office on the same parcel. <br /> <br />Mr. Barthel stated that he originally requested the amendment to place one <br />office building on the parcel along with some multi-family but since <br />making the request, he also felt it would make more sense to change the <br />entire parcel to office/retail. <br /> <br />Commissioner Fuchs stated that he would like to see a one-story office <br />building. <br /> <br />Mr. Joe Crawford. homeowner across Gates Avenue from the proposed site, <br />stated that he wants to see a smooth transition between the residential <br />and commercial districts. <br /> <br />Discussion was carried on regarding an office/retail structure versus a <br />three story multi-family structure as a buffer between the commercial and <br />residential areas. <br /> <br />Building and Zoning Administrator Stephen Rohlf stated that the question <br />the Planning Commission must address is whether or not the concerns are <br />still valid which were addressed at the time the original PUD Agreement <br />was entered into; that is, will the additional office/retail space have a <br />negative impact on the downtown business district. <br /> <br />Chairman Wilson expressed his concern that when additional office and <br />retail space became available in the PUD's on Highway #169, businesses and <br />offices that were downtown moved out. He stated that he was not sure <br />there was a need for more office/retail space. as there currently is <br />office space available for lease. <br /> <br />Mr. Barthel stated that <br />at the proposed site, <br />outside the City. <br /> <br />he wished to locate a business office for himself <br />and also has a potential tenant interested from <br /> <br />Chairman Wilson stated that he does not want the City to set a precedent <br />of amending PUD Agreements. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.