Laserfiche WebLink
City Council Minutes <br />February 22, 2022 <br />Page 8 <br />parking demand, which would help manage project costs and leaves more of the site <br />green if the demand isn't realized. He further discussed other aspects of the concept, <br />noting a certain number of units could be live/workspace; whereby a person could <br />live in the unit and run a small business. He stated the building is geared toward larger <br />units, which people tend to stay in longer. He stated people are choosing rental as a <br />lifestyle and want additional space, likely due to covid/work from home. He further <br />reviewed the architecture, elevations, and renderings. <br />Mr. Mullins discussed market fundamentals, rents, low vacancy rate, market trends <br />compared to the metro area, and infill development pros and cons. He discussed <br />building and financial challenges and their 20-year tax increment financing request. <br />Mayor Dietz asked staff their comfort level with the parking per unit at 2.11. Mr. <br />Carlton stated there has been history of reducing parking with some success, but it all <br />depends on the project details with the number of bedrooms and the <br />retail/commercial uses. He stated on -street parking is not practicable in this location. <br />Councilmember Beyer expressed concerns with the proof of parking being the <br />privately owned parcel adjacent to the project. <br />Councilmember Westgaard stated he likes the project and the mixed uses and would <br />support a marque project with higher quality materials that can also attract additional <br />quality development but questioned the need to do tax increment for housing. <br />Mayor Dietz stated there is hesitancy of the Council to use tax increment and asked if <br />it is worthwhile to have the developer go through the application process. Mr. O'Neil <br />stated yes, and the developer was looking for feedback on options if costs increase for <br />the project. <br />Councilmember Wagner stated there may have been talk of the Housing and <br />Redevelopment Authority (HRA) regarding site acquisition costs and the use of tax <br />increment and asked for clarification on how the HRA would be involved. <br />Councilmember Westgaard agreed noting this started as an HRA initiative. He <br />suggested sending it back to the HRA directing them to get creative and think about <br />how they'd like to fund this in their plan to redevelop this corridor. He stated he <br />would like to see the project cointinue forward. <br />Mayor Dietz suggested a review of the housing study in relation to tax increment. <br />The Council is open to the project and directed work back to the HRA. <br />9.2 Consider Memorial Day Parade as City Event <br />Mayor Dietz asked Council if the Memorial Day parade can be a city -sponsored event <br />and if they would provide barricades and police support. He said he can have <br />volunteers do the other event tasks. <br />I E R E I 1 l <br />NATURE <br />