Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />since July 10th. You talk to Jerry and they say the homeowners allowed it, <br />you talk to someone else and they never said it, and that is the biggest <br />thing Gerry has provided us with the corrections. At this point, like I <br />said, were not sure who is going to be doing the corrections because to be <br />honest I do not know what took place. I know Lot 14 was sold to a builder <br />and the way it sounds they have it worked out, but then talking to the <br />builder, I am not sure. Is anyone here who owns lot 14? Lot 14 right of <br />the-cul-de-sac. <br /> <br />Larry Gloe - Is that the lot that is next to the Woodright house? yes. <br /> <br />Larry Gloe - I know who owns that lot. Matter of fact a friend of my <br />brothers - I did not know that until yesterday. They were cutting the trees <br />on it yesterday because they are going to start building. <br /> <br />Cliff - That is one of the reason I would like Gerry here because a lot of <br />these questions should be addressed to Gerry with this much fill and stuff. <br />Any of these lots on here people own? <br /> <br />Marlene Brown - Where are the retaining walls going in? <br /> <br />Cliff - your house is right here - he is showing a retaining wall running up <br />the hill - right here with the silt fence protecting your property in <br />addition to he is running a silt fence running across and a small one here <br />creating a 4 to 1 coming back - he is proposing a tuck-under which will be <br />addressed through the permit process, the only thing that could go on there <br />is a tuck-under garage. That would bring this fill back up into a gradual <br />slope off the hillside there. Same with this hill, there is a lot of fill <br />that has to be brought back to create this 4 to 1 slope, and also so that we <br />can eliminate the erosion with the silt fencing again, as far as the one <br />with the filled lots, what we have right now are 1 to 1 slopes and no <br />erosion control. There are some that want to close. Lot 8 wants to close. <br />This is yours.. .what he is proposing, what he is showing is a 4 to 1 slope, <br />and that is attained through fill - in addition to the 4- 1 slope. The <br />letter here states that he has to also show the erosion control which would <br />be 3 inches of top soil blanketing and etc. Otherwise even though we put <br />all this fill here with this much water running off were still going to have <br />it down here as far as the drainage in the back lot also. This is something <br />that same thing would apply to on these lots here. What he is showing a <br />retaining wall down at the bottom, a silt fence up on top to slow the water, <br />and also the erosion and also down below for any other just to slow this <br />up. <br /> <br />Lisa - As far as the dirt that is already down there, he should have <br />addressed the area before that before he would work on it - <br /> <br />Bernie Herman - 19038 Carson - This plan shows the erosion control but what <br />about the oak trees as they are very sensi ti ve to being screwed around <br />with. You put a foot of fill over them and that is the reason they die. I <br />am not involved with any of these lots, but I live right there. I've got <br />three nice big trees there with four feet of fill around them. Is it <br />possible that this can be addressed in here also to remove that fill so <br />those trees don't die. <br />