Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Elk River Planning Commission Minutes <br />January 28, 1992 <br /> <br />Page 4 <br /> <br />building light will spillover the property lines of the proposed City <br />Hall. <br /> <br />Eric Jacobson, 13100 183rd Ave., was concerned with the additional <br />noise because of the plowing of the parking lots for snow removal and <br />questioned whether the City has a noise ordinance. Mr. Beck, City <br />Attorney, stated that typically plowing of parking lots would not <br />violate the City's noise ordinance. <br /> <br />Mr. Arden Krinke also questioned whether the Army Corps of <br />has reviewed the plat. Mr. Rohlf stated that they are not <br />review the plat. Ms. Szklarski stated that the Department <br />Resources has reviewed the plat in relation to flood <br />shoreland regulations. <br /> <br />Engineers <br />required to <br />of Natural <br />plain and <br /> <br />Bonnie Rule, 18604 Simonet Drive stated that she was glad to see that <br />there is care being taken in the lighting standards for this project. <br /> <br />Irv Moldenhaurer, 12860 Orono Road, questioned the assessment process. <br /> <br />There being no further comments by the public, Chairman Nadeau closed <br />the public hearing. <br /> <br />COMMISSIONER EBERLEY MOVED TO RECOMMEND TO THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF <br />THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUEST FOR THE NEW CITY HALL AND POLICE <br />STATION BY THE CITY OF ELK RIVER TO BE LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SHORE OF <br />LAKE ORONO. A PUBLIC HEARING WAS HELD ON THE MATTER AND OPPOSITION WAS <br />HEARD. THE PLANNING COMMISSION CITED THE DOCUMENTATION PROVIDED BY <br />STAFF INCLUDING THE WESTERN AREA FEASIBILITY STUDY, FOCUS AREA STUDIES <br />AND THE MEMOS PROVIDED BY STAFF INCLUDING THE FINDINGS OF FACTS <br />OUTLINED IN STAFF'S MEMO. THEY ALSO CITED THE ADDITIONAL INPUT FROM <br />THE CITIZENS AS A RESULT OF THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD 1/27/92 AND <br />THE FINDINGS FROM THAT MEETING. THE PLANNING COMMISSION IS ALSO <br />RECOMMENDING THAT THE EIGHT STIPULATIONS PROVIDED BY STAFF IN THEIR <br />1/21/92 MEMO BE INCORPORATED INTO THE APPROVAL ALONG WITH SEVEN <br />ADDITIONAL STIPULATIONS: <br /> <br />1. <br /> <br />THAT THE <br />PROVIDED, <br />EROSION. <br /> <br />LANDSCAPING BE INSTALLED <br />WITH APPROPRIATE MEASURES <br /> <br />AS INDICATED ON THE PLAN <br />TAKEN TO GUARD AGAINST SOIL <br /> <br />2. THAT LIGHTING ON THE SITE BE DIRECTED AWAY FROM THE RIGHT-OF-WAY, <br />RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES, AND THE LAKE AS SHOWN ON THE PLAN PROVIDED. <br /> <br />3. THAT THE HANDICAP STALLS BE ENLARGED TO A MINIMUM Of 12 FEET EACH <br />WITH APPROPRIATE SLOPES OBTAINED FOR THE RAMPS. <br /> <br />4. THAT THE TRASH RECEPTACLE BE SCREENED AS WELL AS ANY MECHANICAL <br />EQUIPMENT. <br /> <br />5. THAT SIGNAGE FOR THE SITE BE AS PER CITY CODE, WITH APPROPRIATE <br />DIRECTIONAL SIGNS BEING USED. <br />