04-26-1994 PC MIN - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Planning Commission Minutes April 26, 1994 Page 5 . Chairman Tveite opened the public hearing. There being no comments from the public, Chairman Tveite closed the public hearing. Commissioner Minton asked Mr. Dickenson about signage. Mr. Dickenson replied that signage would be as per City code. Commissioner Minton asked Mr. Maurer why an 8-inch water line was suggested in his memo versus a 6-inch line. Mr. Maurer replied that the request was suggested by Bob McCartney because it is likely that they will loop the water line in the future. Mr. Bogart asked the Commission if the City would consider partial payment regarding this water line. Terry Maurer responded that an 8-inch water line is considered standard, therefore, the City would not consider any financial responsibility for requesting the water lines be 8 inches. Commissioner Eberley asked Mr. Bogert to explain some issues regarding drainage. Mr. Bogert responded. Chairman Tveite stated that he would like to see the chain link fence around the property remain as proposed to ensure safety due to the close proximity of Meadowvale School. . Steve Ach responded to Mr. Bogart's comments regarding possibly having to remove additional trees if the parking lot is extended. Mr. Ach stated that due to the amount of hard surface, staff did not feel that any additional parking stalls would need to be provided. Mr. Bogart requested a surmountable curb due to increased difficulty when snow plowing, etc. Terry Maurer explained that surmountable curbis typically used in residential areas. In commercial and industrial B612 is preferred to facilitate drainage, protect landscaped areas, and aesthetics. COMMISSIONER MINTON RECOMMENDED APPROVAL OF THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUEST BY KRAUS ANDERSON TO CONSTRUCT A BUS TERMINAL AND TO HAVE MULTIPLE PRINCIPLE BUILDINGS ON ONE LOT, PUBLIC HEARING, CASE NO. CU 94-13, CITING STAFF'S MEMO AS FINDING OF FACT. THE REQUEST MEETS THE SEVEN STANDARDS FOR GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND IS CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. APPROVAL IS RECOMMENDED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. THE DRAINAGE PLAN BE REANAL YSED TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES BY INCREASING THE DEPTHS OF THE PONDS TO INCLUDE A NORMAL POOL ELEVATION TO ASSIST WITH THE SETTLING OUT OF MATERIAL CONTAINED WITHIN THE RUN-OFF. 2. AN EROSION PROTECTION PLAN BE REQUIRED FOR THE OUTLET FROM POND B. 3. THE STORM SEWER INLET INTO POND A SHOULD INCLUDE CATCH BASINS AND SMALL DIAMETER PIPES. 4. A TEMPORARY/PERMANENT EROSION CONTROL PLAN SHALL BE REQUIRED AND APPROVED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. .