Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Planning Commission Minutes <br />May 28, 1996 <br /> <br />Page 18 <br /> <br />this and the main concern with Commissioner Minton was that the City Attorney <br />was not able to design a firm commitment on the part of the builders to hook up <br />water and sewer. If that can not be done Commissioner Minton would consider <br />this a difficult thing to do. Commissioner Minton stated he does not want to see <br />these two businesses move some place else. Commissioner Minton sees them <br />moving from their current place to 171 st and eventually going someplace else <br />within the City where there won't be sewer and water. <br /> <br />Chair Dillon stated it is not the intention of the two business not to hook up to <br />sewer and water. <br /> <br />Commissioner Minton stated these businesses are land intensive businesses which <br />have a very high assessment rate. <br /> <br />Chair Dillon stated the trucking businesses are looking for the proximity to <br />Highway 10. We have discussed this before to not allow development is to not <br />allow the people who own the property to develop it if they chose. Chair Dillon <br />stated discussion was made regarding this issue at a joint Planning Commission <br />and City Council meeting and the Council knows where the Planning <br />Commission is. <br /> <br />...........................-..........--...--.--.,.-..---.-.-....................................... <br />..."'......................--......................------..--.................................-..........---........ <br />5Jl.S............ .()lscussJ:)el"fdrmance<sforM:lOl"ds/Hidhwav...10............. . <br /> <br />Staff report by Scott Harlicker. Two options were presented, a highway corridor <br />overlay zone and incorporate design standards into the existing highway <br />commercial zone. The benefits and disadvantages of both were discussed. <br /> <br />The Planning Commission would like to discuss this issue further at its June <br />workshop. <br /> <br /> <br />Staff report by Scott Harlicker. Staff reviewed a revised list of permitted and <br />conditional uses for the 11 and 12 zones and a list of uses that are currently <br />allowed. To the extent possible, the list of proposed uses in the 12 zone is <br />cumulative and include those uses proposed for the 11 zone. <br /> <br />Scott Harlicker, Planning Assistant will bring this back as a formal amendment. <br /> <br />...............................,'.'................,',.,.............,.,.........................,.,......................-.-.-.......-...-.....'...-.-......,'.-...-.-.-.-.-.-...-.-..,.,............- <br />..,....-.-.'.'...-.-..,-.-.-.-...-...-.............-.-...........................................'...................:-._...-:-:---:-:.:':.:.;.:.-.-.........:..,... <br />&17. ............OiscusSioH..;.gdWHShdbSdSd...C6ndiftonol.Use..ih..CdmmerCidlZone............ <br /> <br />Staff report by Scott Harlicker. The staff is in the process of updating the <br />licensing procedure for pawn shops. As part of this process staff is looking at <br />whether pawn shops should be considered a permitted retail use or allowed as <br />a conditional use and in what zones they should be allowed. Under the existing <br />ordinance, the issue of where pawn shops are allowed is not addressed. In the <br />past they have been treated as a permitted retail use. <br />