My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-15-1996 PC MIN - SPECIAL
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Minutes
>
1990 - 1999
>
1996
>
02-15-1996 PC MIN - SPECIAL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:35:28 AM
Creation date
9/9/2005 10:08:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
PCM
date
2/15/1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Minutes of Special Planning Commission Minutes <br />February 15, 1996 <br /> <br />Page 3 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Ted Kolberg, 19153 Zebulon street, expressed concern for the safety of children <br />biking and preserving the old oak trees. He felt the road is not necessary and <br />that the numbers don't add up to support it. <br /> <br />Bill Zacarda, 13446 Ranch Road, read a letter from Mark Martin and asked that it <br />be entered into the official record of the Planning Commission meeting. Mr. <br />Zacarda stated he feels the east-west corridor will indirectly affect the quality of <br />life of all the residents of Elk River. He felt the taxes will increase and there will be <br />more demand for services. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Dick Hinkle, 13432 Meadowvale Road, expressed concern for the City taking <br />over county roads due to cost for taxpayers. He stressed the importance of <br />government and residents showing respect for each other, as well as for <br />property. He felt enforcement of speed limits would help control the problem <br />with gravel trucks. He suggested that there could be an agreement with the <br />gravel companies to only run empty gravel trucks on County Road 32, such as <br />there was for Proctor. Mr. Hinkle stated that in approximately 1970, MnDOT did <br />a study to skirt Elk River which would have cut through the back of his property, <br />where 193rd is now, along the railroad tracks and into to Big Lake. Mn/DOT <br />backed away because of the costs and decided to stick to the present system. <br />Mr. Hinkle also explained that the previous owners of the Woodland Trails Park <br />land sold the property to the City below market value, with the understanding <br />that it would be used as a park. He felt the character of the property would be <br />ruined if a road were put through between the park and golf course. Also, he <br />did not want to see the pond at County Road 1 and 32 destroyed. Mr. Hinkle <br />stressed that in striving for utopia, people must show respect for each other and <br />for the land. Mr. Hinkle concluded by saying he was proud of Elk River, the <br />school system, and most of all, of its people. <br /> <br />Robin Tuttle, 13324 Ranch Road, submitted a petition with 391 signatures in <br />opposition of the proposed east-west corridor. <br /> <br />Arne Engstrom, 20800 Meadowvale Road, read the letter from Dave Schwarting, <br />Sherburne County Highway Engineer, in its entirety. He asked the Planning <br />Commission to consider the affect of the east-west corridor on the quality of life <br />in Elk River. <br /> <br />There being no further comments from the public, Chair Dillon closed the public <br />hearing (8:30 p.m.). <br /> <br />Terry Maurer provided the following responses to comments and questions <br />raised during the public hearing: <br /> <br />What are the costs for the proposed roads? <br />Since the transportation study is for "future" roads, it is difficult to estimate costs <br />at this time. The roads may not be built for some time and costs could change <br />considerably. <br /> <br />. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.