Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Planning Commission Minutes <br />September 24, 1996 <br /> <br />Page 9 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />of the city's goals to present a positive image at the east Highway 10 entrance <br />to the city. <br /> <br />Kirt Charest stated he did not feel the outdoor storage would be visible from <br />Highway 10. <br /> <br />Kendra Lindahl noted the building official has concerns regarding the custom <br />made fencing material being used by Mr. Charest. Staff has requested the <br />applicant provide information from the manufacturer regarding strength and <br />weathering capability and has not received it to date. <br /> <br />COMMISSIONER MINTON MOVED THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMEND <br />DENIAL OF THE ZONE CHANGE REQUEST BY JIM AND KIRT CHAREST, PUBLIC <br />HEARING CASE NO. ZC 96-16, AND THE LAND USE AMENDMENT, PUBLIC HEARING <br />CASE NO. LU 96-4, BASED ON THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS: <br /> <br />1. THIS PROPOSED JUNKYARD IS A VERY INTENSE USE FOR THIS LOCATION, AND <br />MAY BE MORE APPROPRIATELY LOCATED IN ANOTHER AREA WHERE IT IS MORE <br />COMPATIBLE WITH THE SURROUNDING LAND USES. <br />2. THE PROPOSED REZONING AND LAND USE PLAN AMENDMENT WOULD IMPACT <br />THE CHARACTER AND INTEGRITY OF THE SURROUNDING RESIDENTIAL AND <br />LIGHT INDUSTRIAL AREAS. <br />3. THIS PROPOSED JUNKY ARD IS INCONSISTENT WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR <br />EAST HIGHWAY 10. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />COMMISSIONER SULLIVAN SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 5-0. <br /> <br />COMMISSIONER MINTON MOVED THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMEND <br />DENIAL OF THE REQUEST BY JIM AND KIRT CHAREST FOR A CONDITIONAL USE <br />PERMIT, PUBLIC HEARING CASE NO. CU 96-17, BASED ON THE FOLLOWING <br />FINDINGS, INFORMATION IN THE STAFF REPORT, AND INFORMATION RECEIVED <br />DURING THE PUBLIC HEARING: <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />1. IF THE ZONE CHANGE AND LAND USE PLAN AMENDMENT ARE NOT APPROVED, <br />THIS CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT IS A MOOT POINT. JUNKY ARDS ARE NOT <br />ALLOWED IN THE LIGHT INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICT. <br />2. A JUNKYARD AT THIS LOCATION WILL DETRIMENTALLY AFFECT THE USE AND <br />ENJOYMENT OF OTHER PROPERTY IN THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY. <br />3. A JUNKY ARD IN THIS LOCATION WILL BE INCONSISTENT WITH THE <br />COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. <br />4. A JUNKYARD WILL IMPEDE THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE SURROUNDING VACANT <br />PROPERTY. IT IS UNLIKELY THAT A RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WOULD TO <br />LOCATE NEXT TO A JUNK YARD. IT IS UNLIKELY THAT CLEAN, QUALITY INDUSTRY <br />WOULD LOCATE NEXT TO A JUNKY ARD. <br />5. THE SITE IS NOT EASILY ACCESSED BY THE NARROW PRIVATE DRIVE, AND <br />EMERGENCY VEHICLES MAY HAVE SOME DIFFICULTY ACCESSING THE SITE. <br />THERE ARE SPECIFIC HEALTH AND SAFETY ISSUES ASSOCIATED WITH A <br />JUNKYARD THAT HAVE NOT BEEN ADDRESSED IN THIS APPLICATION. <br />6. A JUNKY ARD WILL INVOLVE USES, ACTIVITIES, PROCESSES, MATERIALS, <br />EQUIPMENT AND CONDITIONS OF OPERATION THAT WILL BE DETRIMENTAL TO <br />