Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Planning Commission Minutes <br />January 23, 1996 <br /> <br />Page 5 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Dan Boman, applicant, explained he is requesting the requirement for the cul- <br />de-sac be reduced to 28 feet because of the additional cost. He felt his <br />development costs are already extremely high to put in a mile of road for only <br />11 lots. Mr. Boman stated he will be building his home on the 1 7 acre lot in the <br />development. <br /> <br />Commissioner Minton stated he was not familiar with the 4 per 40 concept. <br />steve Ach explained that 4 lots per 40 acres is allowed under the City's Zoning <br />Ordinance, with a minimum lot size of 2-1/2 acres. <br /> <br />Dan Boman explained some of the problems he encountered in resolving the <br />wetland issues. <br /> <br />Chair Dillon opened the public hearing. <br /> <br />Cecilia Scheel, 10271 213th Avenue NW, expressed her opinion that it is unfair to <br />require a road built to the property boundary. <br /> <br />Commissioner Kuester questioned if a private road could be built to access the <br />property. steve Ach explained problems have occurred as a result of allowing <br />private roads. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Terry Maurer cautioned against allowing the 28 foot cul-de-sac, and the <br />possibility of establishing a policy to allow a narrower road under special <br />circumstances. He explained problems that have occurred in the past when <br />roads are not built to the property lines. steve added that if a road is not <br />completed in a particular development, people may assume they are on a cul- <br />de-sac. <br /> <br />Mr. Boman stated that the 28 foot cul-de-sac will save him approximately $2,000. <br />Cecilia Scheel questioned if the Planning Commissioner have done a study of <br />development costs. Chair Dillon stated he was not aware of such a study. <br /> <br />COMMISSIONER MINTON MOVED THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMEND <br />APPROVAL Of THE REQUEST BY MR. DAN BOMAN fOR PRELIMINARY PLAT <br />APPROVAL, PUBLIC HEARING CASE NO. P 95-9, BASED ON THE INfORMATION IN <br />STAff'S MEMO, PUBLIC INPUT, AND SUBJECT TO THE fOLLOWING CONDITIONS: <br /> <br />1. A DEVELOPERS AGREEMENT BE PREPARED OUTLINING THE TERMS AND <br />CONDITIONS Of THE PLAT APPROVAL AND NECESSARY ROAD <br />CONSTRUCTION. THIS DOCUMENT NEEDS TO BE PREPARED AND EXECUTED <br />PRIOR TO RELEASING THE PLAT fOR RECORDING. <br /> <br />2. ADDITIONAL RIGHT-Of-WAY AND OTHER COMMENTS AS REQUESTED BY <br />ANOKA COUNTY BE INCORPORATED AS PART Of THE PLAT. <br /> <br />3. If THE DEVELOPER IS GOING TO SAVE THE TREES ALONG THE NORTH <br />PROPERTY LINE, ADDITIONAL RIGHT-Of-WAY WILL NEED TO BE DEDICATED <br />TO ALLOW THE ROAD TO BE CONSTRUCTED WITHIN THE CENTER Of THE <br />RIGHT-Of-WAY. <br /> <br />. <br />