My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4.1. DRAFT PC MINUTES (1 SET) 01-25-2022
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Packets
>
2021-2030
>
2022
>
01-25-2022
>
4.1. DRAFT PC MINUTES (1 SET) 01-25-2022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2022 9:30:46 AM
Creation date
1/21/2022 9:30:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
PCM
date
1/25/2022
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission Page 4 <br />December 21, 2021 <br />----------------------------- <br /> <br />Commissioner Booth asked about the building design and consideration of <br />neighboring residential properties regarding lighting of the property. <br /> <br />Mr. Kostreba stated exterior lighting would be only on the front and sides of <br />building, with the entrance on the roadside of the building and no lighting would be <br />installed on the back of the building as he didn’t feel it would be needed. <br /> <br />Councilmember Beyer clarified with the applicants that they were aware of the <br />th <br />Highway 169 Redesign project changing the accessibility of 197 Avenue. The <br />applicants stated they were aware. <br /> <br />Commissioner Rydberg stated he’s watched this lot remain vacant since 2008 and <br />understood the need for visibility. He felt the concept was good if the buildings were <br />climate controlled and built well with a good appearance. <br /> <br />Commissioner Keisling expressed his only concern with the high visibility <br />requirement the applicants stated they needed. <br /> <br />The Kostrebas felt the building would still be seen even with the highway project <br />and would increase their visibility along with effective marketing and Google <br />searches. <br /> <br />It was the consensus of the Planning Commission that they would generally support <br />this concept, which would require a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) application to <br />amend the Planned Unit Development (PUD). <br /> <br />9. Adjournment <br /> <br /> The meeting was adjourned at 7:11 p.m. <br /> <br />Minutes prepared by Jennifer Green. <br /> <br /> <br />___________________ <br />Tina Allard <br />City Clerk <br /> <br /> <br />__________________ <br />Perry Beise <br />Planning Commission Vice-Chair <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.