My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7.3 SR 01-18-2022
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2021 - 2030
>
2022
>
01-18-2022
>
7.3 SR 01-18-2022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/14/2022 1:03:42 PM
Creation date
1/14/2022 9:13:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
1/18/2022
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Bruce and Cathy Rahn <br />13665 1851h Ave NW Elk River MN 55330 <br />Mayor and Council <br />This statement is in regards to the vacation of Easement on the property at 13665 185th Ave <br />NW owned by Bruce and Cathy Rahn. The below statements are the beliefs of both parties <br />named above. <br />We would like to state for the record we own said easement and pay the taxes on this <br />particular piece of land. We are asking the City to vacate the easement so we may reclaim the <br />land as ours. Prior to purchasing this property, we started discussion with the city, specifically <br />Chris Leeseberg, about why the easement is there. We will admit we did purchase the property <br />in 2021 not knowing the full reason for the easement. <br />We have since found out that the previous owners were told this piece of property would need <br />to be made into an easement or they would not be granted a building permit for the existing <br />home. 30 years ago the easement was granted to the city for street, utility, and drainage <br />purposes for possible land development if public sewer and water became available. However, <br />the city has not yet needed or used the easement for those purposes. <br />During this process as well, it's been said that vacating the easement would de -value the <br />properties surrounding the easement. At this time there is no parcel of land that would be <br />landlocked at the vacation of the easement proving no de -valuation on surrounding parcels. <br />The only parcel that would be de -valued would be our property. If, in the future, we decided to <br />sell the property, it could deter a sale or make it more complicated because there is an existing <br />easement. <br />As you can see, there is no reason to continue the current easement as it is not being used for <br />what it was originally created for. <br />Thank you, <br />Bruce and Cathy Rahn <br />Bruce Rahn 8-1 Date: <br />Cathy Rahn Date:Ul <br />—`� <br />e� <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.