Laserfiche WebLink
willing to purchase the property at a reasonable price and become the responsible taxpayer of the <br />property ensuring future access and allowing the division of both my property and the Mitzel property <br />at a later date. As an alternative solution, possibly providing a win for all involved, I would like to <br />mention another solution. Sixty-six feet of width is not needed to enter/exit the property. Thirty-three <br />would suffice. This would allow access by myself and my neighbors and allow control of the wooded <br />portion of the Rahn property to remain with the Rahns. <br />I would like to see this issue fairly and absolutely resolved ensuring the easement is traversable <br />for future owners of these properties. <br />If it is decided that the easement is to be vacated, I hope for the property lines to be <br />permanently marked allowing easy reference of each property's boundaries eliminating cause for future <br />issues. <br />Mr. Briggs asked at the meeting tonight (1-3-2022) if there is still access to the property in <br />question and the answer was deceiving, because everybody does have access through my (Jerry Waite) <br />driveway; however, there would not be a sixty -six -foot -wide area without hitting other property owners' <br />homes. <br />Thank you for your time, <br />Gerald P Waite <br />13679185th Ave NW <br />Elk River, MN 55330 <br />