My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7.3 SR 01-18-2022
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2021 - 2030
>
2022
>
01-18-2022
>
7.3 SR 01-18-2022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/14/2022 1:03:42 PM
Creation date
1/14/2022 9:13:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
1/18/2022
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
January3, 2022 <br />Case EV 21-07 <br />John Dietz (Mayor), <br />My thoughts on vacating the easement South of 18560 Naples include the current owner <br />purchasing the Rahn property with full knowledge of the easement and the frequent use of the <br />easement. This easement is used nearly every day and very often multiple times on the same day by <br />myself and my neighbors. <br />I purchased my property knowing that a sixty -six -foot -wide easement was included providing <br />access to the northern portion of my property as a driveway. I was under the impression that my <br />property included the easement from east to west, providing my neighbor (Mitzel property) to the west <br />access to the northern portion of their property as well. It has been used as a driveway since before I <br />was the property owner without any difficulties or issues. After this has been decided I Intend to grant <br />easement for my neighbor to the west through my property ensuring future access to the northern <br />portion of that property if desired. <br />The easement is sixty -six -foot -wide full length (East to West) from my property to Naples, all of <br />which should be cleanable and maintainable by any adjoining property owner. I have traditionally <br />cleared brush, mown lawn and removed snow across the driveway providing access for myself, and the <br />other adjoining properties including the Jim and Alice Waite property, the Missy Mitzel property and the <br />Rahn property, to the northern portion of their properties. This has never been an issue, and I have <br />been assisted by the former Rahn property owners on many occasions in maintaining the driveway. <br />My property was purchased with the intention of dividing into smaller lots for resale at a later <br />date. The loss of the easement would make dividing the property much harder or impossible because <br />the lots would be land locked. The loss of the easement decreases the value of my property both <br />financially and in my day-to-day life. I would expect compensation for the loss of the easement. <br />I am willing to help financially and physically in the upkeep of the driveway. This would be a <br />continuation of how the property has been maintained for as long as I have owned my residence. lam <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.