Laserfiche WebLink
City Council Minutes Page 3 <br />April 19, 2021 <br />----------------------------- <br /> <br />Mr. Leeseberg presented the staff report. <br /> <br />Mayor Dietz opened the public hearing. <br /> <br />th <br />Tim Mullin, 14280 214 NW, Elk River, addressed concerns as the neighbor of <br />the applicant including smell and bugs from keeping pigs, if the pigs would be kept <br />over winter, the process of complaints in the case of smell or noise, who verifies the <br />complaint and if there is a cost to confirming the problem, the timeline of the <br />grievance process, and the request for more chickens than allowed on the property <br />size. Currently, the ordinance states that 12 chickens are allowed on 2.5 or more <br />acres and the applicant has 12 chickens on 2.2 acres and is requesting 24 chickens. <br /> <br />Mr. Mullin also asked if there is a time limit to get a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) <br />and if it expires. Does the CUP go with the house and would there be an effect on <br />property value? <br /> <br />th <br />Carlos Soza, 14296 214 Ave NW, Elk River, the applicant, addressed some of the <br />concerns stating his family wants to maintain a good relationship with their <br />neighbors and the city. He is willing to forego pigs due to the smell and work within <br />the regulations that are proposed. <br /> <br />Mayor Dietz closed the public hearing. <br /> <br />Mr. Leeseberg answered Mr. Mullins questions. The applicant has two years to <br />complete the conditions of the CUP. The CUP will only expire if the applicant does <br />not have any activity for six months and the CUP will go with the property. <br />Agricultural animals have a section of the ordinance and chickens have another layer <br />of rules. The applicant currently has more than the permissible number of chickens <br />based on his property size but the CUP would allow for more. <br /> <br />Attorney Beck talked about the revocation of a CUP and complaints. Complaints <br />would be investigated by staff and, if there are violations of the conditions, it would <br />require a hearing and a decision from the council on whether the conditions have <br />been violated. If so, the CUP could be revoked. Determining a violation due to smell <br />is difficult. There is no cost to neighboring properties to investigate a complaint. <br /> <br />Attorney Beck explained that the CUP would be in affect until its use for agricultural <br />animals was discontinued for six months. However, seasonal animal use would not <br />cause it to expire. <br /> <br />Attorney Beck suggested, if the applicant was no longer requesting pigs, the council <br />could approve the CUP with the condition that there were no pigs. <br /> <br />Council was not in favor of allowing pigs. The CUP allows council to put in <br />conditions to control the quantity and type of agricultural animals allowed. <br /> <br /> <br />