My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7.4. EDSR 12-21-2020
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Economic Development Authority
>
EDA Packets
>
2014-2020
>
2020
>
12-21-2020
>
7.4. EDSR 12-21-2020
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/18/2020 8:35:32 AM
Creation date
12/18/2020 8:32:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
EDSR
date
12/21/2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
93
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />SUMMARY OF RESEARCH AND RECOMMENDED STRATEGIES <br />EDA STRATEGIC PLAN 24 <br />10. INCENTIVES FOR REDEVELOPMENT <br />Redevelopment projects will typically require public sector financial support in all but the <br />strongest market locations. This financial support is offset by the benefits that <br />developments bring to local communities. They may provide housing formats that are <br />needed, or add ground floor retail businesses. They may contribute activity and streetlife, <br />remediate a site that was past its prime, and meet other identified public goals. They are <br />generally speaking also beneficial in the long run from a public financial perspective— <br />providing years of additional property tax revenues after the incentive amount has been <br />recouped. <br />The general need for and appropriate use of incentives for redevelopment was reinforced <br />in our peer city interviews. Public financial support was required for most if not all <br />redevelopment in Oakdale, Forest Lake and Chaska. Public financial support was also <br />required for most new multifamily housing development. <br />In Minnesota, the predominant form of financial subsidy for such projects is tax increment <br />financing (TIF) where that is viable. TIF has two important benefits. First, it doesn’t come <br />at the expense of other city budget items. It consists entirely of future property tax <br />revenues, which are returned to the developer or developer’s lender for a certain number of <br />years. Second, the City’s share of foregone property tax revenues are matched by the <br />contribution of county and school district property tax revenues. That is a differentiator in <br />comparison to tax abatement, because City tax abatement actions are only matched by the <br />county and school district if they also explicitly take that action. <br />The concern about over-enriching a developer by awarding TIF financing can be mitigated <br />by having the TIF request analyzed by the City’s financial advisor. <br />Strategies/Actions <br />10a. Update the City's tax increment financing policy statements to support its use for any <br />redevelopment project, housing project, or mixed use project that is consistent with <br />City plans and policies <br />10b. Utilize the City's financial advisor to ensure that tax increment financing is scaled to <br />the genuine needs of the project <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.