Laserfiche WebLink
<br />§ 3.6.2.3 The Architect shall interpret and decide matters concerning performance under, and requirements of, the <br />Contract Documents on written request of the Owner. The Architect’s response to such requests shall be made in <br />writing within any time limits agreed upon or otherwise with reasonable promptness. <br />§ 3.6.2.4 Interpretations and decisions of the Architect shall be consistent with the intent of, and reasonably inferable <br />from, the Contract Documents and shall be in writing or in the form of drawings. When making such interpretations <br />and decisions, the Architect shall endeavor to secure faithful performance by Contractor and shall not be liable for <br />results of interpretations or decisions rendered in good faith. The Owner’s decisions on matters relating to aesthetic <br />effect shall be final if consistent with the intent expressed in the Contract Documents. <br />§ 3.6.2.5 Unless the Owner and Contractor designate another person to serve as an Initial Decision Maker, as that term <br />is defined in AIA Document A201–2017, the Architect shall render initial decisions on Claims between the Owner and <br />Contractor as provided in the Contract Documents. <br />§ 3.6.3 Certificates for Payment to Contractor <br />(Paragraphs deleted) <br />§ 3.6.3.1 The Architect shall review and certify the amounts due the Contractor and shall issue certificates in such <br />amounts. The Architect’s certification for payment shall constitute a representation to the Owner, based on the <br />Architect’s evaluation of the Work as provided in Section 3.6.2 and on the data comprising the Contractor’s <br />Application for Payment, that, to the best of the Architect’s knowledge, information and belief, the Work has <br />progressed to the point indicated, the quality of the Work is in accordance with the Contract Documents, and that the <br />Contractor is entitled to payment in the amount certified. The foregoing representations are subject to (1) an evaluation <br />of the Work for conformance with the Contract Documents upon Substantial Completion, (2) results of subsequent <br />tests and inspections, (3) correction of minor deviations from the Contract Documents prior to completion, and (4) <br />specific qualifications expressed by the Architect. <br />§ 3.6.3.2 The issuance of a Certificate for Payment shall not be a representation that the Architect has (1) made <br />exhaustive or continuous on-site inspections to check the quality or quantity of the Work, (2) reviewed construction <br />means, methods, techniques, sequences or procedures, (3) reviewed copies of requisitions received from <br />Subcontractors and suppliers and other data requested by the Owner to substantiate the Contractor’s right to payment, <br />or (4) ascertained how or for what purpose the Contractor has used money previously paid on account of the Contract <br />Sum. <br />§ 3.6.3.3 The Architect shall maintain a record of the Applications and Certificates for Payment. <br />§ 3.6.4 Submittals <br />(Paragraphs deleted) <br />§ 3.6.4.1 The Architect shall review the Contractor’s submittal schedule and shall not unreasonably delay or withhold <br />approval of the schedule. The Architect’s action in reviewing submittals shall be taken in accordance with the <br />approved submittal schedule or, in the absence of an approved submittal schedule, with reasonable promptness while <br />allowing sufficient time, in the Architect’s professional judgment, to permit adequate review. <br />§ 3.6.4.2 The Architect shall review and approve, or take other appropriate action upon, the Contractor’s submittals <br />such as Shop Drawings, Product Data and Samples, but only for the limited purpose of checking for conformance with <br />information given and the design concept expressed in the Contract Documents. Review of such submittals is not for <br />the purpose of determining the accuracy and completeness of other information such as dimensions, quantities, and <br />installation or performance of equipment or systems, which are the Contractor’s responsibility. The Architect’s review <br />shall not constitute approval of safety precautions or construction means, methods, techniques, sequences or <br />procedures. The Architect’s approval of a specific item shall not indicate approval of an assembly of which the item is <br />a component. <br />§ 3.6.4.3 If the Contract Documents specifically require the Contractor to provide professional design services or <br />certifications by a design professional related to systems, materials, or equipment, the Architect shall specify the <br />appropriate performance and design criteria that such services must satisfy. The Architect shall review and take <br />appropriate action on Shop Drawings and other submittals related to the Work designed or certified by the <br /> ™ <br />AIA Document B101 Copyright © 1974, 1978, 1987, 1997, 2007 and 2017 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. The “American <br /> – 2017. <br />Init. <br /> Institute of Architects,” “AIA,” the AIA Logo, and “AIA Contract Documents” are registered trademarks and may not be used without permission. This document was <br />10 <br />produced by AIA software at 10:15:59 ET on 11/23/2020 under Order No.9712742774 which expires on 08/13/2021, is not for resale, is licensed for one-time use <br />® <br />/ <br />only, and may only be used in accordance with the AIA Contract Documents Terms of Service. To report copyright violations, e-mail copyright@aia.org. <br />User Notes: (1800630329) <br />134 <br />