My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4.1. DRAFT MINUTES 11-02-2020
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2011 - 2020
>
2020
>
11-02-2020
>
4.1. DRAFT MINUTES 11-02-2020
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/30/2020 10:59:39 AM
Creation date
10/30/2020 9:14:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
11/2/2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Minutes Page 6 <br />October 5, 2020 <br />----------------------------- <br />Mr. Leeseberg clarified Council was looking for an architectural code drawing to <br />make sure everything internal is set up correctly. He stated there are no signed <br />architectural plans to evaluate. He stated it could be required now or would be <br />submitted to the building department later. <br /> <br />Mr. Beck let the applicant know Council is asking for additional building code <br />information so they can decide whether the standards for a conditional use permit <br />are met. <br /> <br />Tim Jones expressed confusion on the need to submit it now versus the later date. <br /> <br />Councilmember Wagner explained there are concerns from the tenants and it is the <br />role of Council to listen and address those concerns before approving a conditional <br />use permit. <br /> <br />Councilmember Ovall stated it’s an awkward predicament with the applicant also <br />being the building owner with tenant issues. <br /> <br />Jeremy Jones stated they need city approval before applying for their state permits. <br />He further stated their current taproom can only hold 17 people due to Covid rules <br />and they would like to keep this process moving through winter in order to get the <br />larger location open. <br /> <br />Tim Jones stated they have sympathy for the tenants and are new to building <br />management, but they are trying to be respectful and helpful to the tenants. He <br />stated he understands their security concerns and it’s something they should have <br />asked for in their leases. <br /> <br />Councilmember Westgaard stated he has an obligation to listen to the other tenants <br />in the building. <br /> <br />Mr. Beck outlined Council was looking for a building code analysis so they can <br />determine the compatibility of this use with the existing uses. <br /> <br />Moved by Councilmember Westgaard and seconded by Councilmember Ovall <br />to continue this item to the October 19, 2020 Council meeting. Motion carried <br />5-0. <br /> <br />8.1 Great Northern Trail Closure Ordinance <br /> <br />Chief Nierenhausen stated Prosecuting Attorney Scott Baumgartner felt there could <br />be liability to the city and some type of indemnification should be in place to close a <br />public walking trail for adjoining private property owners hunting the area. He stated <br />people don’t follow posted notices regarding trail closures and cited the recent trail <br />construction project. He further expressed concerns for his officers in responding to <br />complaints. He stated if Council decides to close the trail the police department can <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.