4.7 SR 06-01-2020 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Sherburne County Multi -Hazard Mitigation Plan, 2020 • There are multiple mitigation measures for the hazard. • The mitigation measure(s) are known to be cost effective. • The mitigation measures protect lives and property for a long period of time, or are permanent risk reduction solutions. • Mitigation methods are established. • The County has limited experience with the kinds of measures that may be appropriate to mitigate the hazard. Moderate . Some mitigation measures are eligible for federal grants. Priority • There is a limited range of effective mitigation measures for the hazard. • Mitigation measures are cost-effective only in limited circumstances. • Mitigation measures are effective for a reasonable period of time. • Methods for reducing risk from the hazard are not well -established, are not proven reliable, or are experimental. • The State or Counties have little or no experience in implementing mitigation measures, and/or no technical knowledge of them. • Mitigation measures are ineligible under federal grant programs. Low Priority . There is a very limited range of mitigation measures for the hazard, usually only one feasible alternative. • The mitigation measure(s) have not been proven cost effective and are likely to be very expensive compared to the magnitude of the hazard. • The long-term effectiveness of the measure is not known, or is known to be relatively poor. Column H — Expected Timeframe Each mitigation action identifies the anticipated timeframe for implementation of the action. Most mitigation actions fall within the next five-year planning cycle. Actions that have a specific timeframe are noted. Column I — Responsible Party Each mitigation action identifies what personnel, department or agency will be lead for the administration or implementation of the action. Column J - Comments on Implementation, Administration & Integration into Local Planning Mechanisms Each mitigation action provides a description of how thejurisdiction will work to incorporate the mitigation activity into other existing planning mechanisms, such as Capital Improvement Plans, ordinance enforcement, public outreach measures or partnership coordination. Column K — Possible Funding Each mitigation action identifies where potential funding may come from to support implementation of the mitigation activity, such as existing county or city funding, state or federal funding. Projects that may be eligible for future FEMA Hazard Mitigation Assistance grant funding are noted. Page1ioi