7.2 SR 06-01-2020 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Rob: It just looks like shoe -boxed together there, if you're going to do that, make some nice apartments like we've already done down on the south end of ABRA across the street, but that's me, we're trying to fix something here but, I just don't feel comfortable with that property in there. Eric: When you explode the view and you look at the street itself and how parking would line up, that would be one of my main concerns. Was the applicant, Zack, -- would they be interested in wider lot widths or anything like that, or are they pretty set on the layout? Zack: This is the application they put forward so I'd say this is their most preferred option. They haven't been asked by the commission or city council to look at larger sized lots, but I would also add that our RFP is also out right now for our comprehensive plan which could look at land -use updates for this area as well for our comprehensive plan guidance. Eric: I'd almost be in favor of waiting to see what happens with the comprehensive plan and what they would designate here. And I see the one drawing here, you're showing — oh, theyjust have them numbered differently. Zack: Yea, this is a — Eric: But this is down in the 30's. Zack: It's 29. It's Lot 1, which you would see right here, would be removed in the event of — two different drawings, two different iterations of it, but it would be the cul-de-sac here so this lot would go away which would drop this lot count down to 29. Eric: All right. After, I mean Jill made some really good points. I'm just not convinced it's the right thing to move forward with that right now until maybe the comprehensive plan is revisited to see what best suits that area holistically. Zack: Chair, we did get one more public comment. It was the applicant and wants to provide some additional feedback on it. So he stated that the setbacks and the distance between buildings is the same as Tall Pines and West Oaks. So it's similar to projects that have gone in. He says a 4-unit building — if you were to put multiple 4-unit buildings in here that would be multiple buildings with no distance in between them, but essentially instead of a townhome it's a common wall, so more space between buildings. His third comment was the rezoning is allowed, it's consistent with the comprehensive plan as was Tall Pines. It was the same building down there so it's the same. It's the same situation that was done for Tall Pines, the first addition. So that's the feedback that he had. Eric: And Tall Pines is the development to the south? Zack: Correct, that was the first addition, this would be the second addition. E:j