Laserfiche WebLink
permit with PUD, and preliminary plat; he recommended the following: <br />1) Approval of zone change from business park to Residential PUD; <br />2) Approval of Conditional Use Permit establishing a PUD with conditions; <br />3) Approval of the Preliminary plat of Tall Pines Second Addition. <br />Roger Derrick supports the Planner's recommendation and agrees to the suggested <br />conditions as stated in the Planners Report. <br />Given the past hearings by the Planning Commission and the Planner's recommendation to <br />approve the application the Planning Commission, without any rational and legal sufficiency <br />denied the zone change, the conditional use for Residential PUD and the preliminary plat. The <br />Planning Commission ignored the Cities' Comprehensive Plan and the change in the <br />neighborhood to residential, and a solution that addressed their past concerns with respect to <br />traffic. The proposed residential development had no factual issues that involved health, safety, <br />and general welfare like Roger Derrick's past developments and other residential developments, <br />there are no facts that support an issue with health, safety and welfare. <br />denial. <br />Planning Commission member Jill Larson -Veto made the following confused motion for <br />"I'm going to make a motion to recommend denial on the basis that the application <br />does not meet items 1 and 3, I don't believe it's in accordance with the <br />comprehensive — or that's number 2 in accordance with the comprehensive plan. I <br />do think that it could detrimentally impact the use of other properties and I do think <br />it could have a detrimental impact on the normal and orderly development of that <br />area." <br />Her motion was not clear on whether it was zone change or two of the factors necessary for <br />approval of a Conditional Use Permit. Also, the confusion is that she thought that the project was <br />not in accordance with a comprehensive plan. The Chair had to clarify her motion that this was a <br />denial of the zone change subsequently denying the Conditional Use Permit and Plat, see attached <br />Planning Meeting Transcription of April 28, 2020. <br />COMPREHENSIVE PLAN <br />The proposed residential development is designated as correct land use according to the <br />Elk River Comprehensive Plan. <br />"The Comprehensive Plan guides this area as Mixed Use which allows a mixture <br />of housing, jobs and/or retail services uses within close proximity to each other. <br />The area also provides another setting for high density residential land uses. The <br />proposed use and rezoning to a residential PUD is supported by the Comprehensive <br />Plan", see Planner's Report. <br />The Comprehensive Plan with a mixed -use designation allows for a residential land use. <br />Also, it should be noted that the mixed -use designation allows for development of the vacant 2.5 <br />acres south of the project. <br />The Elk River Comprehensive Plan has a number of important statements that supports and <br />2350 WYCLIFF STREET - SUITE 200 e SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55114 <br />TELEPHONE 651-224-3781 FACSIMILE 651-223-8019 <br />www.kellyandlemmons.com <br />