Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Commission Page 6 <br /> February 26,2019 <br /> Chair Johnson was fine with it saying"not visible". III <br /> Commissioner Larson-Vito asked if the current ordinance regulates where vehicles <br /> are parked on a property. <br /> Mr. Leeseberg stated vehicle parking is allowable on approved surfaces only. <br /> Commissioner Rydberg suggested the city regulate businesses from a proactive <br /> approach,reminding them of potentially pertinent noise and waste regulations,rather <br /> than waiting until after they've received a complaint. <br /> Chair Johnson suggested adding"from the property line" to the section of the <br /> proposed ordinance changes stipulating that the motor vehicles should be not be <br /> visible from the property line. <br /> Chair Johnson also addressed the section pertaining to the number of customers per <br /> day. He asked if for example a piano teacher were giving 30 minute lessons,it could <br /> add up to more than five pupils per day. He suggested changing the number to two <br /> vehicles at a given point and wondered if it could be restricted to two vehicles per <br /> driveway. However,he also commented people going to a home business typically <br /> don't park in the driveway of the business. <br /> Mr.Leeseberg said a complaint from the police department has been that vehicles III <br /> park partially on the sidewalk. <br /> Chair Johnson asked if the commission was being ultra-restrictive. <br /> Commissioner Rydberg asked how the amount of vehicles at any one time could be <br /> reviewed. <br /> Chair Johnson stated the commission had to have a standard. <br /> Commissioner Jordan felt the issue had become convoluted and it should perhaps be <br /> tabled. <br /> Commissioner Thiel stated the current ordinance was restrictive and,by taking out <br /> or modifying these sections,it may be better. <br /> Commissioner Larson-Vito suggested looking at a clean copy of the proposed <br /> ordinance with the changes the commission had discussed. <br /> The Commission reviewed the changes they agreed and disagreed with. They were <br /> fine with the home occupation operating in a detached structure.They proposed <br /> removing the section pertaining to restricting customers to five per day. They agreed <br /> with the section increasing the number of pupils from two to five.They adjusted the <br /> hours proposed to 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m., seven days a week. Up to five motor III <br /> vehicles can be allowed on site provided they are not visible from the property line. <br /> The Commission felt the recommendation that all doors and windows shall be <br /> 1P-OREBEI IT <br /> NATURE <br />