Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Planning Commission Minutes <br />April 22, 2003 <br />Page 4 <br /> <br />trees, which have been planted. He felt that his 2 ~ acre site provides adequate room to <br />operate his business. <br /> <br />There being no further public comment, Chair Pederson closed the public hearing. <br /> <br />Mr. Kubat asked how the vehicles would get to the parking area. Mr. Casey explained where <br />the driveway would be located. <br /> <br />Commissioner Offerman asked for clarification on the Home Occupation ordinance. Mr. <br />Leeseberg explained that Mr. Casey's business does not meet the criteria for a Permitted <br />Home Occupation, and according to the City's ordinance, he may request a conditional use <br />penmt. <br /> <br />Chair Pederson asked how far back the pole building is from 178m Avenue. Mr. Casey <br />stated that the pole building is setback 80 feet. <br /> <br />Commissioner Offerman asked if the number of deliveries could be reduced. Mr. Casey <br />stated that the current delivery every two weeks could be once a month since he will have <br />more storage space with the new pole building. <br /> <br />Commissioner Franz asked what the size of the pole building would be. Mr. Casey stated <br />that the building is 2,400 square feet. <br /> <br />Commissioner Lemke stated that he visited the site and asked when the oversize doors <br />would be removed. Mr. Casey stated that the doors will be moved when the pole building is <br />finished. Commission Lemke asked if Mr. Casey would be willing to provide additional <br />screening, if his neighbor says he can see the parking area from his property. Mr. Casey <br />stated that there are pine trees on two sides of the area and he did not see how his <br />neighbor's view is affected. Mr. Lemke stated that he felt the site should be inspected and if <br />additional screening is required, that the screening be made part of the recommendation to <br />the City Council. <br /> <br />Commissioner Offerman asked how many vehicles would be parked on the site. Mr. Casey <br />stated that there are four employee vehicles and two company trucks. Mr. Casey noted that <br />the two company trucks would be parking inside the pole building. <br /> <br />Chair Pederson stated that he feels the City wants to see businesses grow, but that at some <br />point, businesses need to move into a commercial or industrial area. He stated that he sees a <br />problem with semi trucks being unloaded from the street in a residential neighborhood with <br />a forklift truck. He recommended that the applicant should be required to provide a hard <br />surface parking area, with paving or concrete. He also recommended that if approved, <br />additional landscaping should be required to shield the view from the neighboring residence. <br /> <br />Commissioner Franz stated that he concurred with Chair Pederson in that a small business <br />can be "incubated" in this type of setting, but at some point, it needs to be moved to the <br />appropriate zoning district. <br /> <br />COMMISSIONER LEMKE MOVED TO RECOMMEND DENIAL OF TIlE <br />REQUEST BY JOHN CASEY FORA CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FORA <br />HOME OCCUPATION (DRYWALL BUSINESS), CASE NO. CU 03-06, BASED <br />ON TIlE FOLLOWING FINDING: <br />