Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Planning Commission Minutes <br />February 27. 2001 <br />Page 5 <br /> <br />Commissioner Baker asked how the proposed sign would be lit. Mr. Harlicker <br />stated that the sign will be lit internally. <br /> <br />Chair Mesich opened the public hearing. <br /> <br />Commissioner Baker asked how bright the sign would be. Jim Schavauzer, <br />representing Jiffy Lube, stated that sign will be the same as the Blaine Jiffy Lube. <br />He explained that the lighting would be similar to the Burger King sign. <br /> <br />Commissioner Pederson asked how many wall signs are on the building. Mr. <br />Schavauzer stated that there are two wall signs; one on the west side of the <br />building facing Highway 169 and Main Street. and one on the south side towards <br />the Home Depot and Wal-Mart. Mr. Schavauzer suggested that instead of brick <br />for the base of the sign. that they use the same block as was used on the <br />building. Commissioner Pederson stated that when the conditional use for Wash- <br />n-FiII was approved. it was his recollection that another sign would not be <br />needed for the lube facility. Mr. Schavauzer stated that he felt the discussion was <br />clear that they would be asking for a sign and that the issue was tabled because <br />they needed site drawings for the sign. Chair Mesich was in agreement with <br />Commissioner Pederson's recollection that an additional sign would not be <br />needed. <br /> <br />Jim Schavauzer stated that when the Wash-n-FiII conditional use permit was <br />approved. Jiffy Lube did not have a signed agreement with Wash-n-Fill. <br /> <br />Commissioner Baker stated he did not have a problem with the request and felt it <br />would be a nice looking sign. Commissioner Johnson expressed his agreement. <br /> <br />COMMISSIONER BAKER MOVED TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE REQUEST BY <br />JIFFY LUBE FOR AN AMENDMENT TO THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR WASH-N- <br />FILL/JIFFY LUBE, TO ALLOW A FREESTANDING SIGN, CASE NO. CU 01-05, WITH THE <br />FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: <br /> <br />1. THE APPLICANT APPLIES FOR A SIGN PERMIT. <br /> <br />2. THE BRICK BASE MATCH THE BUILDING EXTERIOR AND BE WIDENED TO 12 <br />FEET AND THE CABINET FOR THE CHANGEABLE COpy BE A 31f2' X 12' <br />RECTANGLE. <br /> <br />3. THE SIGN COMPLIES WITH THE SIGN REQUIREMENTS FOR ELK RIVER <br />CROSSING PUD AGREEMENT. <br /> <br />COMMISSIONER ROPP SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 5-2. Chair <br />Mesich and Commissioner Peterson opposed. <br /> <br />5.5. Reauest by Finn Daniels Architects for a Conditional Use Permit for an auto- <br />related use and an Amendment to Elk River Retail Center 2nd Addition Planned <br />Unit Develooment to Allow Signage for Site (Precision Tune Auto Carel, Public <br />Hearing - Case No. CU 01-10 <br />