My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-27-2001 PC MIN
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Minutes
>
2000 - 2009
>
2001
>
02-27-2001 PC MIN
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:35:11 AM
Creation date
5/20/2005 3:22:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
PCM
date
2/27/2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />- <br /> <br />Planning Commission Minutes <br />February 27.2001 <br />Page 18 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />that the City is proposing a broad agricultural use for the Cargill property. and <br />that specific uses would be addressed through the conditional use permit <br />process. He felt there were advantages to both the City and Cargill through a <br />conditional use permit. and that Cargill would have more certainty for the long <br />term. Mr. Beck noted that if Cargill found it necessary in the future. a conditional <br />use permit could be amended. <br /> <br />Discussion followed regarding whether to act on the issues and pass on to the <br />City Council. or to table the requests to the next meeting. to allow staff more time <br />to review the changes proposed by Cargill. <br /> <br />Chair Mesich opened the public hearing. <br /> <br />Alex Class, representing Dorsey & Whitney, stated that Cargill is opposed to the <br />amendments as proposed and that their expectations are that the zoning <br />amendments to provide Cargill certainty for continuing their operation for the <br />long term. She stated that they feel they are making progress with staff and that <br />she realizes staff did not have an opportunity to see the revisions proposed in the <br />February 23rd letter. She stated that they did not have a problem moving the <br />requests forward to the City Council level. but that they are not waiving any of <br />their legal options to oppose the amendment. <br /> <br />Chair Mesich stated that he felt any major issues could be addressed by the <br />Planning Commission through the conditional use permit site plan review. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />It was the consensus of the Commissioners to table these issues. <br />COMMISSIONER BAKER MOVED TO TABLE THE REQUESTS BY THE CITY OF ELK RIVER <br />FOR ORDINANCE AMENDMENTS, LAND USE AMENDMENT AND REZONING TO THE <br />MARCH 27, 2001 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING. COMMISSIONER JOHNSON <br />SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 7-0. <br /> <br />5.16. <br /> <br />Reauest bv City of Elk River for Ordinance Amendment to amend definitions of <br />Government facilities. government offices and to amend conditional uses in the <br />residential districts. Public Hearing - Case No. OA 01-03 <br /> <br />Michele McPherson stated that Sherburne County has asked that this item be <br />tabled to the March 27, 2001 Planning Commission meeting, in order to further <br />discuss the proposed definitions. <br /> <br />COMMISSIONER BAKER MOVED TO TABLE THE REQUEST BY THE CITY OF ELK RIVER <br />FOR A ORDINANCE AMENDMENT TO AMEND DEFINITIONS OF GOVERNMENT <br />FACILITIES, GOVERNMENT OFFICES, AND TO AMEND CONDITIONAL USES IN THE <br />RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS, CASE NO. OA 01-03. COMMISSIONER CHAMBERS <br />SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 7-0. <br /> <br />5.17. Reauest by City of Elk River for Ordinance Amendment to Amend Sections of the <br />Cluster Ordinance. Public Hearinq - Case No. OA 01-01 <br /> <br />Scott Harlicker reviewed the cluster ordinance revisions recommended by the <br />Planning Commission at the January 23. 2001 meeting. <br /> <br />. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.