Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Planning Commission Minutes <br />September 26, 2000 <br /> <br />Page 8 <br /> <br />5. PARKING SHAll BE ON PAVED SURFACES ONLY. <br /> <br />6. THAT A DUMPSTER BE SHOWN ON THE SITE PLANS AND CONSTRUCTED OF <br />MATERIALS SIMilAR TO THE BUilDING WITH A GATE. <br /> <br />7. THAT THE lANDSCAPE PLAN BE REVISED TO CONFORM TO CITY ORDINANCE. <br /> <br />8. THAT A LIGHTING PLAN BE PROVIDED THAT CONFORMS TO CITY ORDINANCE. <br /> <br />9. THAT AN AMENDMENT TO THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT .BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO <br />PHASE TWO OF THE SITE DEVELOPMENT. <br /> <br />COMMISSIONER KUESTER SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 5-0. <br /> <br />5.6. <br /> <br />Request bv John Bunkers for Conditional Use Permit for Car Wash Detail Shop, <br />Public Hearina - Case No. CU 00-38 <br /> <br />Staff report by Steve Wensman. John Bunkers requests a conditional use permit <br />to allow a car wash detail shop in the Barrington Place Planned Unit <br />Development (568 Dodge Avenue). Mr. Wensman explained that Dolphin <br />Carwash plans to delay part of their expansion which was approved last month, <br />and instead, move their detail operation to Mr. Bunker's site. Mr. Wensman <br />reviewed issues related to the site regarding noise, hours of operation, easements, <br />emergency vehicle access, landscaping and parking. Staff recommends <br />approval of the request with the conditions outlined in the staff report. <br /> <br />Chair Chambers opened the public hearing. <br /> <br />Mr. lynn Caswell, 580 Dodge Avenue, stated that John Oliver and Associates has <br />no objection to Mr. Bunker's request as long as operations are done inside the <br />building. He expressed concern that the landscaping proposed by staff may <br />interfere with the site lines onto Dodge and suggested that if any trees were <br />planted, that they be tall overstory trees and trimmed high to allow maximum <br />visibility. <br /> <br />Commissioner Kuester stated that she felt the use proposed by Mr. Bunkers is <br />much more compatible than the earlier proposal. <br /> <br />Commissioner Chambers asked if any new signs are proposed for the property. <br />Mr. Wensman stated that none are proposed at this time, but that a sign permit <br />would be required if any are requested in the future. <br /> <br />There being no further comments from the public, Chair Chambers closed the <br />public hearing. <br /> <br />Commissioner Baker asked if the sign on the games building was permanent. Mr. <br />Bunkers stated that he did not feel the sign was acceptable and that the sign <br />would be coming down after the Christmas season when the tenant was in a <br />better financial position to replace it with a better quality sign. <br />