My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-26-2000 PC MIN
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Minutes
>
2000 - 2009
>
2000
>
09-26-2000 PC MIN
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:35:11 AM
Creation date
5/20/2005 3:02:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
PCM
date
9/26/2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Planning Commission Minutes <br />September 26, 2000 <br /> <br />5.11. <br /> <br />Page 17 <br /> <br />There being no further comments from the public, Chair Chambers closed the <br />public hearing. <br /> <br />COMMISSIONER PEDERSON MOVED TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE REQUEST <br />BY VANMAN COMPANIES ON BEHALF OF LEFEBVRE TRUCKING CO. FOR AN <br />AMENDMENT TO THEIR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW A 60 FOOT WIDE <br />DRIVEWAY, CASE NO. CU 00-37, WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: <br /> <br />1. NO OVER-LENGTH TRUCKS WILL BE ALLOWED TO ENTER THE SITE FROM THE <br />EAST WHICH WOULD REQUIRE THE OPERATORS TO CROSS THE CENTER LINE <br />OF THE ROADWAY. <br /> <br />2. THE ENTRANCE SHALL BE STRIPED. <br /> <br />3. THE LANDSCAPING PLAN WHICH WAS APPROVED AS PART OF THE <br />CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT SHALL BE COMPLETED BY MAY 31, 2001. <br /> <br />COMMISSIONER BAKER SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 5-0. <br /> <br />Home Deoot Discussion <br /> <br />Mr. Harlicker explained that the recently painted Home Depot building does not <br />match the paint chip which was given to staff in the approval process. Staff feels <br />that the color on the building is more of a yellow shade than a tan. The original <br />paint chip, a sample of the Home Depot standard color, and a sample of the <br />actual paint on the building were passed around for the Commission to view. He <br />noted that none of the colors are the same. He noted that staff was asked to <br />approve each of the building materials as they moved through the construction <br />process, but not the color of the building. Mr. Harlicker stated that the Planning <br />Commission is asked to consider whether or not they will accept the color of the <br />Home Depot building, or require the contractor to repaint the building. <br /> <br />Mr. Todd Mosher of Greenberg Farrow, representing Home Depot, explained <br />Home Depot's position on the base color of the building. He felt that the shade <br />which the building was painted was an acceptable shade of tan. He did not <br />recall that staff was told the building would be painted exactly the color of the <br />paint chip. Mr. Mosher presented a sample board which is a replica of the one <br />presented to staff and the Commission during their approval process. He stated <br />that the board is used to demonstrate the various types of materials and may not <br />reflect the exact colors. <br /> <br />A representative of ICI Deluxe Pain Centers explained how a paint color can look <br />like another color when it is painted on different types of surfaces. He also <br />explained how paint batches can vary and that paint chip samples which are <br />given out by paint stores are produced by computer and are not actual "paint" <br />samples. <br /> <br />Commissioner Baker asked what staff's position was on the issue. Mr. Harlicker <br />stated that since the colors of the other building materials were determined <br />based on the color of the building, staff feels the building should be repainted. <br />Ms. McPherson stated that since the color does not match Home Depot's own <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.