Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Planning Commission Minutes <br />August 24, 1999 <br />Page 10 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />P 99-10 (PRESERVE ESTATES), WITH THE STIPULATION THAT THERE BE NO SUBSTANTIAL <br />DEVIATION FROM THE ROADWAY AND LOT CONFIGURATIONS WHICH WERE <br />PRESENTED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, WITH THE ALL OF THE PRECEDING <br />CONDITIONS, AND THE FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL CONDITION: <br /> <br />23. THAT AN ADDITIONAL 10 FEET BE ADDED TO THE DRAINAGE AND UTILITY <br />EASEMENT EAST OF TYLER STREET WHICH MAY BE USED FOR TRAIL PURPOSES. <br /> <br />COMMISSIONER THOMPSON SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 5-1. <br />Commissioner Mesich opposed. <br /> <br />6.7. Request by Windsor Develooment for Preliminary Plat AoorovallSeven Oaks), <br />Public Hearing Case No. P 99-9 <br /> <br />Staff report by Michele McPherson. Windsor Development has requested <br />approval of a preliminary plat for a 69.40 acre, 86 lot. single-family development. <br />Ms. McPherson reviewed issues addressed in the staff report to the Planning <br />Commission dated August 24, 1999, regarding wetlands, access, grading and <br />drainage, landscaping, homeowners' association, Outlot A, and park dedication <br />requirements. She explained that the Park and Recreation Commission has <br />recommended Lots 15 and 16, Block 2, be added to the land being dedicated <br />as park for a total park dedication of 4.06 acres, or 5.8% of the land. Staff <br />recommends approval of the preliminary plat with the addition of a condition 20 <br />for the developer to acquire access to Lander Street. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Chair Cote asked why the Park and Recreation Commission recommended a 20 <br />foot buffer from the trail to the rear property line of the adjacent lots. Ms. <br />McPherson indicated that this recommendation is based on experience with trails <br />behind lots in previous new development projects. <br /> <br />Commissioner Kuester explained that she felt the additional lots were necessary <br />to protect the neighborhood park amenities and to make the park accessible to <br />all residents of the community. <br /> <br />Chair Cote asked if the city engineer felt the east-west road through the plat <br />would be used as a cut-through route by M-Vale residents to County Road NO.1. <br />Terry Maurer stated that residents close to the existing outlot may use the road, <br />but most would use either the north or south end of Lander Street to get to a <br />county road. <br /> <br />Chair Cote opened the public hearing. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Ron Bastyr, of Windsor Development, developer for the project, reviewed the <br />project. He stated that he felt the trees near the proposed trail need to be <br />removed now, because he has found that despite efforts to preserve them, they <br />will eventually die. Mr. Bastyr explained his plans to landscape the entrance to <br />the development along County Road No.1. He indicated that possibly two lots <br />could have been gained by eliminating the amenities at the entrance, but he felt <br />the aesthetic value was more important. He requested that the easement be <br />platted for ownership and maintenance by the homeowners' association. Mr. <br />Bastyr stated that the loss of Lots 15 and 16, Block 2, for park land would create a <br />financial hardship to the viability of the project. and asked that the lots remain in <br />