Laserfiche WebLink
Plaintiff alleged that Charter terminated her employment in violation of the FMLA and Michigan Persons with <br /> Disabilities Civil Rights Act. On May 29,2015, a jury verdict was entered against Charter on the FMLA <br /> interference claim, and in Charter's favor on the FMLA retaliation and discrimination claim. <br /> Marcin v. Charter,EEOC and Wisconsin Department of Workforce Development(DWD) Complaint No. <br /> CR201201053. Complainant alleged that he was discriminated against based on his arrest record. On June 18, <br /> 2013,the DWD determined that there was probable cause to believe that Charter may have violated the Wisconsin <br /> Fair Employment Act by discriminating against the Complainant based on his arrest record. A hearing on the merits <br /> of the complaint was held on February 12,2014. On December 30, 2014,the administrative law judge issued a <br /> decision adverse to Charter. Charter appealed the decision to the State of Wisconsin Labor and Industry Review <br /> Commission and the administrative law judge's decision was upheld. <br /> Perona v. Time Warner Cable,United States District Court for the Central District of California No.5:14-CV- <br /> 02501-PA MWF-SP. On October 20, 2014,Plaintiff alleged that TWC discriminated against her because of her <br /> disability,failed to accommodate her disability, failed to engage in the interactive process with her, retaliated against <br /> her,and wrongfully terminated her. After TWC obtained partial summary judgment,TWC prevailed on disability <br /> discrimination,failure to accommodate,retaliation,IIED, and claims relating to an alleged unlawful medical inquiry <br /> at trial, but a jury verdict was entered in favor of Plaintiff on one cause of action,failure to engage in the interactive <br /> process,for$160,000. <br /> SMRH:228071011.1 -14- <br />