Laserfiche WebLink
4. Our proposed plan will support the Steering Committee's recommendation to maintain a <br />logical commercial corridor appearance without the construction of strip centers. <br />Accordingly, our plan will not conflict with the equally important goal of maintaining and <br />encouraging downtown development. <br />5. Current availability of commercial property in the City is low, if not non existent. The only <br />other viable piece of property able to support commercial activity is Mr. Hohlen's property, <br />which, by law, will take a few years to become available due to the relocation requirements <br />of the existing residences. <br />6. The "line in the sand" of 194th Avenue has significantly different issues on the west side <br />versus the east side of the road. With the residential neighborhoods already in place on the <br />west side, the east side has the logical opportunity to develop in a manner consistent with <br />accepted planning and development concepts. Therefore, appropriate buffering of future <br />neighborhoods east of the commercial area can, and will, take place. <br />T Our proposed plan and design materially and physically supports the Goals and Policies <br />recommended by the Steering Committee under section V. Commercial Plan, paragraphs A. <br />and B. in the draft Comprehensive Plan Update. <br />In summary, we have a plan that is consistent with the already established Highway 169 commercial <br />corridor, provides a natural continuation of commercial opportunities for existing businesses, and <br />enhances the City's ability to improve its already burdened tax base. <br />We will pursue this matter as it proceeds to the Planning Commission and City Council. Please enter <br />this letter into the Committee's record at the September 21, 1995 meeting. Thank you for the <br />opportunity to comment to the Steering Committee. <br />i <br />Sincerely 'l <br />Richard C. Foster <br />