My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Letters from Residents
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Steering Committee
>
1995 Comprehensive Plan (2)
>
Letters from Residents
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/5/2018 1:06:42 PM
Creation date
12/5/2018 1:02:27 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
97
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1e1/26/r77J Ub:'dl Y4'1-IJIU4 UUKFIY m MAMF rA(�L u' <br />October 242 1995 <br />Dear Robert, <br />I am writing you this note because I will not be able to attend Thursday nights Planning <br />Commission public hearing of the Draft Comprehensive Plan. <br />I am currently the chair of the Elk River Park and Recreation Commission and its <br />representative to the Steering Committee. I would like to take this opportunity to share some <br />general comments about our Draft Comprehensive Plan. Because transportation and parks will be <br />discussed at future meetings, I will not comment on those issues at this time. <br />I had hoped to be able to review staffs recommendations prior to writing this note, but as <br />of late Tuesday, October 24th, they were not available. <br />As I am sure you are aware, there was a significant amount of public input on several <br />issues throughout the Steering Committee process. This public input is generally reflected in on <br />recommendations and I would like to address two of those issues which are tied closely together <br />and those are residential land use and extension of the urban service area. <br />The overwhelming sentiment of long time residents and newcomers alike is the desire to <br />plan for growth that will maintain or improve the "quality of life" we now enjoy. While those <br />words cover a very broad range of issues, the main theme always seemed to be to maintain the <br />-rural character" of our community. <br />The steering committee made recommendations regarding the extension of urban services <br />to impact commercial and 'industrial opportunities much more significantly than residential. We <br />trade this decision based on a number of factors of which maintaining rural character was most <br />significant. Other issues were residential tax burden, traffic, impact on schools and city services, <br />and amount of wet lands and utility corridors which significantly affect the net amount of land that <br />can be developed which, in turn, affects the cost effectiveness. <br />Still, the basic issue is , what do we want our community to look like in the future? We <br />must remember community growth should be planned and not driven by developers requesting a <br />zoning change or expansion of our urban service area to utilize sewer plant capacity. <br />The other issue which the steering committee discussed that relates to "quality of life" and <br />"maintaining rural character" is allowing or requiring significant open space to be designed into <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.