My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
July 6, 1995 Steering Committee Minutes
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Steering Committee
>
1995 Comprehensive Plan (2)
>
Minutes
>
July 6, 1995 Steering Committee Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/5/2018 12:55:36 PM
Creation date
12/5/2018 12:51:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
date
7/6/1995
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Steering Committee Minutes <br />July 6, 1995 <br />Page 3 <br />Ten Acre Minimum <br />Pat Dwyer indicated he was in favor of preserving the 10 acre minimum lot size <br />in the A-1 zoning district. He stated that he felt the goal of the City is orderly <br />development by expanding the urban service district outward, and not allow <br />smaller lot sizes in outlying areas. <br />Chair Minton reported he received a letter from Bob Dare, resident on County <br />Road 33. Mr. Dare stated he and his neighbors were not in favor of changing <br />the 10 acre minimum lot size. <br />Arne Engstrom stated he also felt the City should develop from the core area <br />outward, in order to provide necessary services in a cost effective manner. <br />Discussion followed regarding cluster housing in the A-1 zoning district. <br />Steve Ach explained the concept of clustering homes. He noted advantages <br />such as fewer roads being required, and the perception of open space is <br />preserved. Steve explained that the open space could be maintained by <br />utilizing a conservation easement, convenants and/or restrictions; however, the <br />use of these types of restrictions need to be carefully reviewed to determine the <br />benefit and disadvantages. Steve indicated that clustering is not a new <br />concept, rather a subdivision method that is not understood by most <br />developers. <br />Arne Engstrom suggested the clustering concept could be applied in the Rio <br />zoning district as well. <br />Dick Hinkle expressed his concern that the open spaces would need to <br />maintained by someone, as there could be problems with noxious weeds and <br />gophers. <br />Arne Engstrom suggested recommendations for shared driveways along county <br />roads to reduce access points. <br />Dave Anderson stated he was in favor of defining the urban service area, and <br />that the rest of the community be developed in a unique fashion to preserve <br />the rural character. He stated he was in favor of the 10 acre minimum to <br />preserve the farms, not for future sewer and water. Dave suggested than an <br />option be allowed for clustering, in addition to the existing 4 per 40 rule(10 acre <br />minimum). He suggested a 2-1/2 acre density overall, with a minimum of 1 acre <br />lot size and require 50% open space with some sort of conservation easement. <br />Pat Dwyer stated he would like to see the 4 per 40 development in the northern <br />area, which would attract hobby farm development. <br />Arne Engstrom expressed his concern how the open space would be affected <br />by property taxes. Dave Anderson stated it was his understanding that when <br />land is put into a conservation easement; the landowner receives a deduction <br />off his Federal taxes. The deduction is determined by the value of the land when <br />it is sold versus the value as conservation easement space; therefore, benefiting <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.