Laserfiche WebLink
EPA Emissions Possible changes to U.S. Environmental Protection Agency(EPA) <br /> Standards Uncertain emissions standards increase planning uncertainties. <br /> The EPA's Mercury and Air Toxics Standards (MATS) Final Rule, <br /> issued in April 2013, established emission limits for mercury, <br /> particulate matter, sulfur dioxide, acid gases, and certain individual <br /> metals for new power plants. The MATS Rule was expected to <br /> particularly affect the cost of future coal and oil-fired power plants if <br /> it fully went into effect. After reviews by courts, the D.C. circuit <br /> court suspended the case indefinitely. <br /> In 2015, the EPA also reviewed the research linking smog exposure <br /> to adverse health effects such as asthma. Subsequently, the EPA <br /> updated the ozone rules with stricter limits to tighten standards on <br /> ozone from 75 parts per billion (ppb)to 70 ppb. In a court filing in <br /> April 2017, the federal government said the EPA officials appointed <br /> by the new administration were reviewing the 2015 rule to <br /> determine whether the EPA should reconsider some or all of the <br /> rule. <br /> In addition, the federal government is reviewing the Clean Power <br /> Plan, which aims to cut emissions from existing power plants by <br /> 32% by 2030, and the Waters of the United States (WOTUS) rule. <br /> These emissions standards and rules could be scaled back or <br /> eliminated. <br /> In March 2017, in a broad executive order on energy,the <br /> Interagency Working Group on the Social Cost of Greenhouse <br /> Gases was disbanded. This order withdrew the group's technical <br /> documents that form the scientific and economic basis for <br /> calculating the social cost of carbon and provide federal agencies a <br /> key tool to measure the benefits of cutting greenhouse gas <br /> emissions. While the absence of guidance from the federal <br /> government on the cost of carbon and other emissions could lead to <br /> confusion in certain types of planning scenarios, the Minnesota <br /> Public Utilities Commission has established emission costs. The <br /> costs are in its order Updating Environmental Cost Values issued on <br /> January 3, 2018 and in its order Establishing 2018 and 2019 <br /> Estimate of Future Carbon Dioxide Regulation Costs issued on June <br /> 11, 2018. <br /> Initiatives to While the federal government has indicated a desire to the scale <br /> Decrease Carbon back or eliminate environmental regulations, individual states and <br /> Emissions some cities are taking initiatives and setting goals and rules to first <br /> cap and then decrease carbon emissions from certain sectors of their <br /> economies. In Minnesota,the legislature has a state CO?reduction <br /> 79 <br />