My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Packets
>
2000-2005
>
2003
>
04-08-2003
>
Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2018 11:03:37 AM
Creation date
7/23/2018 11:03:36 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• ELK RIVER PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> WORKSHOP NOTES <br /> TUESDAY, APRIL 8, 2003 <br /> Members Present: Chair Pederson,Commissioners Anderson,Franz,Jenson,Lemke, <br /> Offerman <br /> Members Absent: Ropp <br /> Staff Present: Michele McPherson,Director of Planning; Scott Harlicker,Senior <br /> Planner;Chris Leeseberg,Planner <br /> Call to Order <br /> The meeting was called to order at 6:30 p.m. <br /> 1. Rle Zoning Standards <br /> The Commission reviewed information provided by staff regarding the change in the <br /> minimum lot size for the Rle Zoning District. The Commission reviewed the 1996 staff <br /> • reports relating to the changes in all residential zoning district standards. The Commission <br /> reviewed a number of options to protect the natural features on the east side of the <br /> community in the areas that are currently undeveloped. The options for protection include <br /> rezoning the undeveloped Rte areas to Rid,which has a lot area of 14,000 square feet. The <br /> currently subdivided sites would be rezoned to R1c. <br /> The Commission discussed alternative residential subdivision standards and the merits of <br /> reverting back to PUD requirements. Chair Pederson asked if this was not going back to <br /> something the City Council wanted to get away from,as the adoption of the R3 Townhome <br /> standards was reaction to too many Planned Unit Developments being approved. <br /> Commission Anderson stated that from his experience and training,the PUD is the <br /> strongest tool a city has for directing and manipulating development,however,standards and <br /> expectations must be set high to ensure that the city gets what it needs from a development <br /> and does not give away all of the advantages to the developer. <br /> After continued discussion regarding the pros and cons of R1c versus Rld versus PUD,the <br /> Commission agreed that for the interim,the Hillside area and the area south of County Road <br /> 12 would be rezoned to Rlc and the undeveloped area north of County Road 12 would be <br /> rezoned to Rld. <br /> 2. Business Park Standards-Analysis of Adjacent Communities'Standards <br /> The Commission reviewed the information provided by staff regarding a comparison of light <br /> Industrial and Business Park zoning standards of adjacent communities. The comparison <br /> was between Elk River,Big Lake,Anoka,Ramsey,and Rogers. For all intents and purposes, <br /> • the requirements are relatively similar except in the instance of outdoor storage. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.