My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 5.2 - 5.4
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Packets
>
2000-2005
>
2002
>
09-24-2002
>
Item 5.2 - 5.4
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2018 9:39:09 AM
Creation date
7/23/2018 9:39:07 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Harlicker <br /> 1110. September 18, 2002 <br /> Page Two <br /> We will review these calculations to ensure that in the future when the remaining property <br /> is developed, adequate storm sewer can be provided to service the fully developed site. <br /> 4. Our general review of the grading plan indicated that while the overall plan appeared to be <br /> adequate there were a few items that will have to be reviewed in greater detail at a larger <br /> scale. These items have been explained to the developer; they include the grading along <br /> and adjacent to the large wetland at the north side of the property and also a determination <br /> of emergency overflows for all portions of the project. <br /> 5. There is sufficient capacity for sanitary sewer and watermain to service this development. <br /> Generally the sanitary sewer and water system will be considered public and will be <br /> maintained by the City and the Elk River Municipal Utilities. Final determination of hydrant <br /> locations, valve locations, watermain looping, and sewer alignment has yet to be <br /> determined. <br /> 6. Another issue that we discussed with the developer and his engineer were the location of <br /> sidewalks throughout the project. Based on this discussion, sidewalks have now been <br /> added on both sides of all public streets. In addition, sidewalks are shown around Block 1 <br /> and Block 3 of townhouse units, which are located on the north side of the project. One <br /> issue yet to be decided would be who maintains the sidewalks adjacent to public streets. <br /> 7. The EAW for this development has been revised, reviewed, and approved by the City staff. <br /> I believe it is currently being advertised for public comment. From an engineering <br /> standpoint, the major change in the EAW caused by the change in usage from the original <br /> proposal for this site is a much lower traffic count. The current proposal for development of <br /> this property will generate traffic that can be handled by the two access points shown, one <br /> being full movement at the southwest corner of the site and the other a right-in/right-out at <br /> the northwest corner of the site. <br /> If you have any questions regarding any of this information, please call. <br /> Sincerely, <br /> Howard R. Green Company <br /> 4:&7/47114-(41,ed <br /> Terry J. Maurer, P.E. <br /> TJM:sgw <br /> • <br /> Howard R. Green Company <br /> Ltr-091802-Harlicker.doc CONSULTING ENGINEERS <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.