My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 6.2
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Packets
>
2000-2005
>
2000
>
07-25-2000
>
Item 6.2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/16/2018 9:49:25 AM
Creation date
7/16/2018 9:49:16 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
103
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
30 Aesthetics, Community Character, and the Law <br /> corporation of design features that mitigate congestion and traffic-related <br /> impacts,such as sidewalks and landscaping. (See Fleming(1994)for an ex- <br /> cellent visual essay on franchise design alternatives.) <br /> Opportunities for design review are increasing as corporate franchises <br /> move into new areas,such as downtowns,to take advantage of marketing <br /> opportunities away from their traditional strongholds, the suburban <br /> neighborhoods and interstate highways.Adjusting to these new locations <br /> often means tailoring their facilities in sensitive ways, perhaps by adding <br /> underground parking or reconfiguring floor plans to fit narrow historic <br /> buildings. The major food-service corporations (e.g., McDonald's, Burger <br /> King) have shown a willingness to adapt to unusual spaces if it makes <br /> The major food-service good economic sense: Being a good neighbor can promote a healthy cor- <br /> corporations(e.g.,McDonald's, porate image,which translates into increased sales. <br /> Burger King)have shown a Many communities are enjoying significant progress in their efforts to <br /> willingness to adapt to unusual increase the quality of franchise design. The design guidelines for Albe- <br /> spaces if it makes good marle County,Virginia,for example, feature a McDonald's restaurant as a <br /> economic sense:Being a good model to be emulated, "an example of architecture compatible with his- <br /> neighbor can promote a torically significant local buildings" (Albermarle County Department of <br /> healthy corporate image,which Zoning). <br /> translates into increased sales. If necessary,however,local officials are going to court to enforce their <br /> design review programs, as was illustrated in a 1991 case from Holden, <br /> Massachusetts.14 In that case, a local government refused a request from <br /> the Mobil Corporation to install a large, 19-foot canopy, similar to those <br /> the company installs on most of its stations,on a gas station in a historic <br /> district. A Massachusetts Superior Court upheld the denial, agreeing <br /> that the canopy would be incompatible with the surrounding architec- <br /> ture. In its opinion, the court underscored the importance of the local <br /> preservation commission's role in preserving the local architectural and <br /> cultural heritage. <br /> Communities attempting to regulate the design of corporate fran- <br /> chises should be clear in their guidelines about the exact type of design <br /> they want. Extensive illustrations and definitions should be used to ex- <br /> plain difficult concepts like"community character" to franchise owners <br /> and their architects. Local planners should be ready and willing to ne- <br /> Neotraditional neighborhoods gotiate on design issues. They should educate he s lues as <br /> to the feasibleeco- <br /> attempt to recapture the sense nomic needs of a franchise so they can suggestY <br /> al- <br /> of community found in ternatives to standard design templates. They should be able to cite <br /> successful neighborhoods that examples from similar communities showing how changes mandated <br /> have endured for half a century by design review required minimal investment (as a percentage of total <br /> or more by replicating the project cost) and were recouped many times over in good will andcus <br /> 5t_ design elements of those tomer loyalty.Finally,communities should be firm and strong-willed in <br /> neighborhoods and by enforcing their design review programs, if necessary defending their <br /> -, fostering pedestrian-friendly systems in court. As Ed McMahon,director of the Conservation Fund's <br /> environments that discourage American Greenways Program, has noted, "If you accept the lowest <br /> reliance on the automobile. <br /> common denominator in development, you'll get it every time. If you <br /> insist on something better, you'll get that almost every time" (Clark <br /> 1 1996). <br /> New applications for neotraditional design standards. Neotraditional <br /> development, also known as New Urbanist development or traditional <br /> neighborhood development (TND), has enjoyed such booming growth <br /> and populanty over the last few years that, today, most every planner it <br /> familiar with its basic tenets.Neotraditional neighborhoods attempt to re- <br /> capture the sense of community found in successful neighborhoods tha <br /> have endured for half a century or more by replicating the design element: <br /> of those neighborhoods and by fostering pedestrian-friendly environ <br /> ments that discourage reliance on the automobile. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.