Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Page Seven <br />May 18, 1981 <br /> <br />expressed concerns of the School District regarding the costs that would be <br />assessed to them for the project. <br /> <br />General discussion was carried on regarding the sewer project, specifically <br />benefits, purpose, and the .most economical design at this time. Mr. Lloyd Cyr, <br />a member of the School Board, indicated that the ponding areas would not hold <br />any more water and that at the present time, flooding in the basement of the <br />Senior High School is possible and further indicated that he felt the design <br />of the storm sewer should drain away from the ponding areas. Mr. Jerry Rolin <br />questioned the design of the storm sewer as another temporary measure and the <br />citizens would have to be assessed again when it was updated again. Mr. Mauer <br />indicated that the design proposed would provide for the immediate needs of the <br />School Street area and would provide for future expansion. General discussion <br />was carried on as to future expansion, the size of the pipe, and the need of <br />ponding areas. Mr. Mauer indicated that the proposed design is a portion of the <br />permanent solution. Mr. Kreuser also recommended that the City Council consider <br />the storm sewer more thoroughly and suggested the storm sewer be designed to <br />drain from Holt down School Street rather than around to the ponding areas be- <br />hind the school. <br /> <br />Mr. Tim Thompson, Estelle Gunkel, Julie Hipp, Richard Lestol, Mr. Kevin Dehri, <br />Mr. and Mrs. Elliott, and Mr. Al Baker all expressed their concerns regarding <br />the upgrading of School Street and the design of the storm sewer system. It <br />was the general concensus of the citizens present that the engineers proceed <br />with the proposal for a 33 foot width street to the Municipal State Aid System <br />for approval and funding and to review the proposed storm sewer project and <br />proposed alternatives in its design. COUNCILMAN TOTH MOVED TO CONTINUE THE <br />PUBLIC HEARING ON THE SCHOOL STREET IMPROVEMENTS UNTIL FURTHER INFORMATION FROM <br />MSA AND THE CITY ENGINEERS COULD BE OBTAINED. COUNCILMAN DUITSMAN SECONDED THE <br />MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 4-0. <br /> <br />14. City Beautification Committee Report on Proposed Projects <br /> <br />Dr. Jarmoluk was present to discuss the progress of Project 1 with the City <br />Council and the proposals of Project 2 and 3. Dr. Jarmoluk indicated that vol- <br />unteers have been organized to clean up the area along Highway #10 and further <br />indicated that Aksarben is putting together a proposal to present to the City <br />Beautification Committee for the upgrading and cleanup of the downtown Jackson <br />Place Park. Dr. Jarmoluk indicated that the third project, the fencing of the <br />Municipal Parking Lot, would require lumber and paint, and estimated the cost <br />to be approximately $900. The City Administrator requested that the Council <br />authorize the City Administrator to discuss the proposed Project 3 consisting <br />of the fencing of the Municipal Parking Lot with the Police Chief as to traffic <br />safety and store security. Mayor Hinkle indicated that the committee should <br />obtain the proposal and drawings from Aksarben regarding the downtown parking <br />lot. <br /> <br />15. Elk Cinema Amusement Device License <br /> <br />Mr. Carl Brownfield was present to discuss the application for four amusement <br />device machines in his movie theater lobby. Mayor Hinkle indicated that the <br />purpose for licensing of such machines is for the control of the operation of <br />these.machines. COUNCILMAN DUITSMAN MOVED TO APPROVE THE APPLICATION FOR AMUSE- <br />MENT DEVICE LICENSE FOR FOUR MACHINES REQUESTED BY MR. CARL BROWNFIELD. COUNCIL- <br />MAN SCHULDT SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 4-0. <br />