Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Page Six <br />May 18, 1981 <br /> <br />system would be constructed from Sixth Street down to Fourth Street. The <br />total cost of this proposed project is $211,800. Mr. Mauer explained the boun- <br />dary of the benefiting properties would be assessed at approximately $990 per <br />acre. The street project would provide for the upgrading of School Street from <br />Proctor to Highway #169 to a nine ton road, 44 feet wide, of which could be used <br />as two lanes of traffic, or one lane with parking or left turns, depending on <br />signing. The total cost of the street project is $352,550. Mr. Mauer explained <br />that the area benefited would be assessed on a front foot basis along School <br />Street. Mr. Mauer also indicated that the sidewalk project would be the place- <br />ment of sidewalks from School Street down Irving to Fifth Street. The cost of <br />the sidewalk project is $31,000. Mr. Mauer indicated that the cost of the side- <br />walk would be paid completely from MSA funds and would not be assessed. Mr. Mauer <br />reviewed the proposed cost for the storm sewer, street and sidewalk project. The <br />storm sewer drainage project would be $148,400, assessed at a cost of approximately <br />$990 per acre, and the street would be $113,000, assessed at an estimated cost of <br />$12.50 per front foot. Mr. Mauer indicated that the proposed assessment roll was <br />based on other communities assessment policies. Mayor Hinkle indicated that the <br />assessment roll is a suggested means of cost recovery and that an assessment <br />hearing would be held before specific costs were assessed. <br /> <br />Mr. Doug Reisewitz, Mr. Al Schroder, Kay Elliott, and Tim Thompson all indicated <br />their opposition to the 44 foot width proposed for School Street and questioned <br />how the properties along School Street could be benefited by the proposed four <br />lane highway. Councilman Engstrom indicated that there was a safety and water <br />problem on School Street and this proposal was the best way of solving that pro- <br />blem. Councilman Toth indicated that the project was proposed to solve the pro- <br />blem on School Street and the street must be built to MSA standards in order to <br />receive MSA funds for the project. Questions were also raised as to where the <br />street would go. Mr. Terry Mauer indicated that there was an existing 66 foot right- <br />of-way and that the property owners would be taken into consideration in the <br />design. <br /> <br />Mr. Tony Hipp, representing the East Side Citizens Group, indicated that infor- <br />mation they received from the Department of Transportation indicated that traffic <br />counts taken on School Street would allow the street to be built at less than <br />44 feet and still qualify for MSA funds. Mr. Hipp indicated that the East Side <br />Citizens Group did not want a 44 foot street that would allow for parking or turn <br />lanes and further indicated that the group's recommendation was to leave the street <br />at approximately 32 to 33 feet in width. Mr. Hipp indicated that the East Side <br />Citizens Group was in agreement of the storm sewer project but requested that the <br />City Council look at the proposed project very carefully to have the best system <br />available to satisfy the problem. <br /> <br />Mr. Terry Mauer indicated that a less than 44 foot street would have to be approved <br />by the Municipal State Aid System. Mr. Mauer further indicated that the sewer <br />system design was the best possible immediate solution to the problem which <br />would also allow for future development and growth in the area. <br /> <br />Mr. LaRock of the East Side Citizens Group indicated that they wanted more specific <br />details regarding the project. The City Administrator indicated that Mr. LaRock <br />was asking for plans and specifications which would be ordered by the City Council <br />if the project was to proceed. Mr. Lloyd Brutlag, Business Manager for the school, <br />