My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5.3
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Packets
>
2000-2005
>
2001
>
07-24-2001
>
5.3
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/11/2019 2:13:19 PM
Creation date
5/7/2018 9:52:06 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
rd.), <br /> • Howarc R. Green Conoany <br /> July 19, 2001 <br /> File: 815030)-0240 <br /> Mr. Scott Harlicker <br /> Senior Planner <br /> City of Elk River <br /> 13065 Orono Parkway <br /> P.O. Box 490 <br /> Elk River, Minnesota 55330-0490 <br /> RE: HILLTOP WOODS ESTATE-2ND ADDITION <br /> Dear Mr. Harlicker: <br /> As requested, we have reviewed the submittal for the Hilltop Woods Estate-2nd <br /> Addition. The submittal package consisted of a preliminary grading plan, preliminary <br /> plat, and preliminary on-site wastewater treatment plan, all prepared by John Oliver and <br /> Associates. Also submitted was a Preliminary Evaluation for the On-site Sewage <br /> System dated June 2001, also prepared by John Oliver and Associates. Based on our <br /> • review and comments heard at the staff review meeting, we would offer the following <br /> comments: <br /> 1. No storm drainage calculations were submitted. The concept shown on the <br /> preliminary grading plan shows storm water being conveyed to catch basins <br /> and then to two holding ponds located in Outlot B. Flow arrows indicate that <br /> the southerly pond will overflow to the northerly pond, which will ultimately <br /> overflow to the land to the north. Drainage calculations will have to insure <br /> that water does not discharge from the site at a greater rate than before <br /> development. It is also questionable whether or not the storm water <br /> discharging from the site to the north can be at a concentrated location if the <br /> existing condition is spread out along the northern perimeter. <br /> 2. The on-site treatment design that was submitted was very general in nature <br /> and did not include any soil borings. Therefore, it did not include a detailed <br /> final design on the system. A final design will have to be done after soil <br /> borings are taken and submitted for review and approval. It should be noted <br /> that the proposed on-site sewage treatment facility is located in Outlot B <br /> along with the storm water detention ponds. Care will have to be taken to <br /> insure that there is no possibility of the ponds overtopping into the treatment <br /> facility area. Total flow expected in the treatment system is well below the <br /> 10,000 gallons per day requiring a Minnesota Pollution Control permit. <br /> 3. The grading plan indicates that several of the lots have very flat driveways. <br /> There are even a couple of lots, Lots 5 and 6, Block 1, where the house pad <br /> is below the street elevation. We would recommend that the grading plan be <br /> • adjusted to raise these two sites so that the house pad is above the street <br /> elevation and to verify the driveway grade on each of the remaining lots. <br /> O:\P ROJ\815030j\0240\Ltr-071901-Harlicker.doc <br /> 1326 Energy Park Drive • St. Paul, MN 55108 • 651/644-4389 fax 651/644-9446 toll free 888/368-4389 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.