My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Packets
>
2000-2005
>
2001
>
06-26-2001
>
Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/7/2018 9:16:29 AM
Creation date
5/7/2018 9:16:26 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission Minutes/Elk River Station <br /> June 26,2001 <br /> Page 11 <br /> Commissioner Mesich asked if a concept plan was available for the senior housing <br /> component. Mr.Pratt explained that they have met with Guardian Angels 3—4 times and <br /> twice with their architect. They have requested several months to analyze and develop their <br /> concepts. When details are available,they will be presented to the Commission. He noted <br /> that Carol Mills of Guardian Angels has stated they have a strong desire to build a daycare <br /> center attached to the senior housing. <br /> Commissioner Mesich asked how parking would be affected by the senior housing. Mr. <br /> Pratt explained that these senior housing units are cooperative and are individually owned. <br /> Parking would be similar to Dominium's apartment project. <br /> Marc Putman stated that the apartment building is roughly 30 apartments per floor(less <br /> than 90 units) with a greater percentage of parking than they normally see. <br /> Commissioner Mesich stated he was concerned that the area which was previously proposed <br /> to be commercial is now going to be senior housing,and if so,where are these people going <br /> to go,when they want to walk to the hairdresser or the drycleaners,etc. Mr.Pratt stated that <br /> Guardian Angels stated that they have proposed the senior housing be where all the"action" <br /> is, all the cars and people, at their request. <br /> Chair Pederson asked if the apartment buildings would be three-story. Mr.Sween stated that <br /> they are proposing a"step"design for a 2-3-4 story building,which will take away from the <br /> "mass"appearance of the building. He stated they are also considering offering a number of <br /> choices including 1 bedroom apartments, 2-bedrooms, and townhouse-style apartments <br /> • where the living area is underneath the sleeping area. <br /> Brian Lubben,BKV Group,reviewed sketches of the proposed apartments,stating that <br /> this style of building tends to break up the facade and presents a more monolific appearance. <br /> He stated that the ends of the buildings will be stepped down. There will be approximately <br /> 52 units per block. A variety of materials will be used,including brick and siding,and will <br /> feature architectural treatments such as bumps and bays. <br /> Mr. Harlicker reviewed the location of the proposed project at this time for those in the <br /> audience who are not familiar with the project. <br /> Commissioner Mesich asked why single family detached townhomes are not included in the <br /> plan. He asked where garages will be located. Mr.Putman explained that there will be two <br /> types of buildings;one will be a"row house"configuration and the other will be"back-to- <br /> back". He stated that when finished,it will be difficult to tell the front from the back. The <br /> appearance of the ends of the buildings will be given careful consideration. The fronts of <br /> the buildings will face the sidewalks and greens. He stated that they have worked hard to <br /> become a model for current market rate multi-family residential housing. He felt they will <br /> accomplish this by mixing up a variety of buildings (large masses and small masses) and <br /> turning them different directions,with some order and organization,and by using different <br /> scales and designs with interesting architectural treatments. Mr.Putman explained that there <br /> are design challenges in planning single family detached townhomes and he felt this type of <br /> housing style works better in areas that are well-defined and removed from other places; <br /> where each development can have its own little"pod". Often empty nesters prefer this type <br /> of housing. Mr.Putman did not feel this design would work because of the layout of the <br /> • site. He felt there is only so much that can be done in designing this type of housing and <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.