Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Commission Minutes/Elk River Station <br /> June 26,2001 <br /> Page 10 <br /> 5.9. Request by Elk River Station,LLP for Conditional Use Permit(Elk River Station),Public <br /> • Hearing— Case No. CU 01-08 <br /> Senior Planner Scott Harlicker stated that staff has been working with the applicants on the <br /> following issues: <br /> 1. Access to the site, future connection to the north, south and east. <br /> 2. Commercial/office locations <br /> 3. Senior housing/daycare center <br /> 4. Townhouses, expanding the amount of open space. <br /> 5. Apartments/community center <br /> 6. Pedestrian access/sidewalks <br /> 7. Landscaping <br /> 8. Park and Recreation Commission comments. <br /> 9. Grading and drainage. <br /> Len Pratt,co-applicant,introduced John Peterson,co-applicant,and the design team for <br /> this project. He explained that the project began last fall,about the same time the Northstar <br /> Corridor Development Authority (NCDA) began meeting with the City to discuss the <br /> commuter transit station and the MN/Dot Park and Ride facility. These outside influences <br /> have driven their request for approval of a residential,mixed-use community. Mr.Pratt <br /> stated that they are aware the City had very different plans for this area from what is being <br /> proposed.The project has been designed using guidelines of NCDA,as well as the City of <br /> Elk River. He felt that staff has done a good job of listening to them. <br /> Mr.Pratt stated that he has some experience in commercial development in a variety of cities <br /> including New Brighton. He stated that they are proposing a total of 80,000 square feet of <br /> commercial space for the Elk River Station project located in various buildings.He reviewed <br /> his project in the City of New Brighton which was done with Paul Sween and Chris Barnes <br /> of Dominium. Uses included insurance,mortgage,financial planning,and dental offices,as <br /> well as a restaurant, deli, coffee shop and dry-cleaning facility. He explained that the <br /> residential provides the critical mass for the services,and the services provide the rationale <br /> for the residential to live close together,and be able to walk or ride a bike,rather than having <br /> to drive. Mr.Pratt provided a summary of the densities for the various components of the <br /> project. <br /> Chair Pederson opened the public hearing. <br /> Director of Planning Michele McPherson explained to the residents present that a more <br /> formal presentation will be given by the developers at the July 24th meeting,but that if they <br /> had any questions or comments at this time,they are welcome to speak. <br /> Commissioner Mesich asked if all of the external parking spaces for the apartments are <br /> necessary, if they are proposing underground parking as well. He felt that there was a <br /> significant amount of asphalt being proposed. Paul Sween of Dominium explained that <br /> they have provided for a 2:1 ratio for parking,which is a community-based standard. The <br /> area will be buffered by some large mature trees. He explained that this project will be less <br /> dense than any of their other projects,due to the abundance of green space. Commissioner <br /> Mesich asked if they will be able to excavate and build the apartments without removing the <br /> existing trees. Mr.Sween stated that most of the trees will be preserved and new ones will <br /> • be planted,as well. He noted that they will be marking individual trees and siting buildings <br /> in order to preserve trees. <br />