Laserfiche WebLink
• 5. Hydrology <br /> There are wetlands as identified by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and flood plain <br /> along the Mississippi River, Elk River and Trott Brook which also limits development (Figure <br /> 2-L). This affects land in the southern part of the City where there is currently <br /> development pressure. The floodplain encompasses the floodway and flood fringe. <br /> Each of these districts restrict certain uses which places constraints on development <br /> potential. Land within the 100 year flood plain should be used for agricultural and <br /> recreational purposes or wildlife preserves. Residential, commercial and industrial <br /> development should not occur in these areas except for accessory uses such as <br /> parking areas and landscaped areas. <br /> As was mentioned in the discussion of soils, there are substantial areas with high water <br /> tables causing wet and poorly drained soils. Development of these areas will be limited <br /> due to high cost associated with soil correction, and avoiding groundwater pollution. <br /> Groundwater plays a significant role in the location and intensity of development. <br /> Figure 2-M was generated from information provided by the Minnesota Geological <br /> Survey from their Quaternary Hydrogeology Study dated 1979. Quaternary <br /> Hydrogeology deals with the water-bearing characteristics of the layer of materials <br /> which are located between the area's bedrock and the topsoil. Area 3 generally has <br /> the highest ratio for a sand and gravel mixture in the City. This area produces 3 to 4 <br /> times the amount of groundwater as does Area 1 and up to 300 times the amount in <br /> Area 2. Area 1 subsurface characteristic creates a high sensitivity for groundwater <br /> contamination. Groundwater contamination in this area also has potential for seepage <br /> • into the Mississippi River with resultant river contamination. Area 3 also contains the <br /> landfill. Intense urban development should be avoided in Area 1 until municipal sewer <br /> and water is provided. <br /> 6. Existing Development <br /> Existing development within the City is concentrated in the southern and central areas <br /> (Figure 2-N). The core city is nearly fully developed with smaller urban sized lots and <br /> concentrated commercial facilities radiating out into the urban service area. <br /> Considerable leap-frog residential development has occurred to the north and <br /> northwest of the core city, with lot sizes of one, two and a half, and five acres. There is <br /> also evidence of ten acre lots in the outlying agricultural areas along the county road <br /> network. These rural subdivisions present constraints relative to the extension of <br /> municipal services and necessary road improvements. The city's current growth <br /> management policies will deter this type of development pattern from occurring. <br /> 7. Development Constraints Composite <br /> By superimposing the various development constraints maps, it is possible to identify <br /> land masses considered restrictive to development. Figure 2-0, entitled Developable <br /> Lands, displays land restrictive to development as well as lands available for <br /> development. <br /> Visual inspection of Figure 2-0 reveals large areas of restrictive lands, however, this map <br /> is a general description of those areas and may best characterize areas which will <br /> impose challenges for development. <br />